Bhagavan is one of the names of Vishnu. But Ramanujacharya is
referred to respectfully as Bhagavad Ramanuja. Is it all right to use a word
that refers to the Lord while talking about Ramanuja? Yes, said P.T. Seshadri
in a discourse. There are many reasons why Ramanuja should be called Bhagavad
Ramanuja. In his Sri Bhashya, Ramanuja showed us the meaning of Bhagavan,
relying on sage Parasara’s explanations. Yamunacharya wanted the world to know
of the significance of Pancharatra Agamas, which are referred to as Bhagavad
Sastra. Ramanuja wrote a work called Nitya, which is based on the Pancharatra
texts. So, he made many aware of what is called Bhagavad Sastra, and hence he
is Bhagavad Ramanuja.
The advice that Lord Krishna gave to Arjuna on the battlefield is
called Bhagavad Gita, and Ramanuja wrote a bhashya for the Bhagavad Gita.
Ramanuja ordered Thirukkurukai Piran Pillan to write a commentary for
Nammazhvar’s Thiruvaimozhi. Subsequently more commentaries came to be written
by others too. Thiruvaimozhi is called Bhagavad vishaya, and since it was
Ramanuja who was instrumental in the writing of the first commentary for
Bhagavad Vishaya, he is Bhagavad Ramanuja. Ramanuja made the world realise the
greatness of mantras, and this too is a reason for his being referred to as
Bhagavad Ramanuja.
Ramanuja was unique, for those associated with him were granted
liberation by the Lord. In Nyasa Tilaka, Vedanta Desika says he should be saved
because of his connection to Ramanuja. Desika came over two centuries after Ramanuja,
but there is an unbroken succession of Acharyas through whom one is connected
to Ramanuja. For all these reasons, Acharya Ramanuja should be called Bhagavad
Ramanuja.
No comments:
Post a Comment