Epicureanism and schadenfreude are two very different concepts—one is a complete philosophical system from ancient Greece, and the other is a single emotional experience. Here's a brief comparison and explanation of each:
1. Epicureanism
Origin: Founded by the Greek philosopher Epicurus (341–270 BCE).
Core Idea: The purpose of life is to attain pleasure (defined as the absence of pain or distress) through moderation, friendship, knowledge, and virtuous living.
Misconception: People often mistake Epicureanism for indulgence in luxury, but Epicurus actually advocated for simple pleasures and tranquility (ataraxia).
Ethical Outlook: He promoted compassion, rationality, and peaceful coexistence, avoiding harmful desires and unnecessary conflict.
2. Schadenfreude
Origin: A German word literally meaning "harm-joy".
Definition: The feeling of pleasure or satisfaction at another person's misfortune.
Examples: Laughing when a rude person stumbles; feeling pleased when a rival fails.
Psychology: Considered a social emotion, often tied to envy, competition, or justice.
Ethical Outlook: Generally viewed as a negative emotion or moral failing in many philosophical and religious traditions.
Comparison and Contrast:
Aspect Epicureanism Schadenfreude
Type Philosophy Emotion
Goal Long-term happiness through virtue and reason Short-term pleasure from others' pain
Ethical stance Encourages kindness, moderation, inner peace Can arise from envy, spite, or social comparison
Emotional focus Serenity, freedom from fear and pain Joy at others' suffering
Long-term effect Promotes harmony and wellbeing Can harm relationships and one's own peace of mind
Would an Epicurean endorse schadenfreude?
No. Epicureans believed that harming others—or taking joy in their harm—ultimately disrupts one's own peace and the harmony of society. Even if schadenfreude gives a momentary thrill, it would be incompatible with the Epicurean pursuit of sustained inner peace and virtuous friendship.
Certainly! Let’s explore how other major philosophical and spiritual systems—Stoicism and Buddhism—view schadenfreude, and how each compares with Epicureanism:
1. Stoicism and Schadenfreude
Overview of Stoicism:
Founders: Zeno of Citium, later developed by Epictetus, Seneca, and Marcus Aurelius.
Core Idea: Live in harmony with nature and reason; cultivate virtue as the highest good.
Goal: Achieve apatheia—freedom from destructive emotions.
Stoic View of Schadenfreude:
Firmly rejected. Stoics held that:
Emotions like envy, gloating, or malice are irrational and harmful to the soul.
Feeling joy at others' misfortune reflects inner weakness and lack of control.
The wise person (sophos) is emotionally balanced, unaffected by external events, and compassionate even toward wrongdoers.
“The best revenge is to be unlike him who performed the injury.” — Marcus Aurelius
Stoicism promotes:
Compassion, self-mastery, and justice.
Replacing reactive feelings like schadenfreude with sympatheia—a sense of shared humanity.
2. Buddhism and Schadenfreude
Overview of Buddhism:
Founder: Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha).
Core Idea: All beings suffer due to craving, ignorance, and hatred.
Goal: Attain enlightenment (nirvana) by overcoming suffering and delusion.
Buddhist View of Schadenfreude:
Strongly discouraged.
Schadenfreude arises from envy, pride, or ill-will—all of which are kleshas (mental poisons).
Rejoicing in others’ suffering generates negative karma and strengthens ego.
“Hatred does not cease by hatred, but only by love; this is the eternal rule.” — The Dhammapada
Buddhism promotes:
Mudita: Sympathetic joy—rejoicing in others’ happiness.
Karuna: Compassion for others' suffering.
Equanimity: Emotional balance and detachment from ego-based reactions.
Concept Epicureanism Stoicism Buddhism
View on Schadenfreude Rejected as harmful to peace Rejected as irrational and unkind Rejected as rooted in ignorance
Emotional Ideal Ataraxia (tranquility) Apatheia (inner calm) Upekkha (equanimity)
Ethics Focus Pleasure through virtue Virtue through reason Liberation through compassion
Reaction to Others’ Misfortune Avoid or feel sympathy Stay rational and just Respond with compassion
All three traditions, despite differences in metaphysics and methods, converge in rejecting schadenfreude as a morally and spiritually damaging emotion. Instead, they promote self-control, empathy, and inner peace—tools for living a fulfilled and ethical life.