Q. Please explain in vedanta sara how gamanam and paripurna brahmanubhavam via Archiradhimargam is brought out? {S 8 S}
Ans:Archiradhyadhikaranam
Suthra 1. "Archiradhina thathpra thitheh."
The self of the knower reaches Brahman through the path of light as is known from the scriptures.
The path through which the soul of a knower of Brahman passes and attains Brahman.
"atha yadhuchaivasmin cchavyam kurvanthiiyadhi cha na, archisham Eva abhisambhavanthi, archishah ahah, ahnah, Apooryam Ana paksham, Apooryamana pakshath yan shadudhang Ethi masan, Tnanm Asebhyah samvathsaram, samvathsarath Adhithyam, AdhithyAt h Chandhramasam chandramasah vidhyutham tath purusho amanavaha Enan brahma gamayathi Esha dhevapathah brahmapathah Ethena prathipadhyam AnAima m manavam Avartham nAvarthanthe."
meaning: Now as from such persons, that is the knower's of Brahman whether the cremation rites are performed or not. They go to light, from light to the day, from the day to the bright fortnight, from the bright fortnight to the six months of uttarayana, from that to the year, from the year to the sun, from the sun to the moon, from the moon to the lightening when a person from the region of Brahma comes and guides them to realize Brahman. Those who go by this path do not return to this mortal world.
"atha yathra asmath sarira thuthkra mathi atha Ethair eva rasmibhih oordhvam akramathe yavath ksipye thmanahthavath Adhithyam gacchathi; Ethadhvai khalulO Kadhvaram vidhusham"
meaning: When he departs from the body he proceeds upwards through these very rays as long as it takes the mind to travel in that short time he goes to the sun that indeed is the door to the world of Brahman for the knowers. These passages are from Chandhogya Upanishad.
Kousheetaki Upanishad's version is
"Sa Etham dhevayanam pan thanam Apadhya agni lokam agacchathisa vayu lokam, sa varuna lokam, sa indhra lokam, sa prajapathi lokam sa brahma lokam."
Thus the journey is described as from devayana to world of fire, that of air, that of water, that of Indhra, and that of Brahma, the creator and from there to brahma loka.
The poorva pakshin presents a view that these roads are several and independent. This is refuted by the suthra. All roads are one, that of light only and the differences in description is only due to the details. As the divinities mentioned are the same they differ only in minor points.
Suthra 2 Vayvadhikaranam.
"Vayumabdha th avisesh abhyam."
From the year to vayu because of general and specific words.
The different texts describing the path of the man of knowledge, though are of same content, the order of the places reached seem to differ in each.
In Chandhogya the soul is said to reach the month, year and the sun in that order. While in Brhadharanyaka the order is given as the month, the world of the devas and the sun respectively. Since the path is the same according to both texts.
In Brhadharanyaka there is another passage that states, when a man departs from this world he goes to the air, who makes for him an opening like wheel of a chariot through which he proceeds upwards and comes to the sun.
In Kousheetaki text the world of vayu is after that of agni, light and before the world of devas. Here it is argued that the world of vayu has to be placed before Sun agni etc. Then it is also argued that the world of the devas and the world of Vayu is the same. Then it is proved that the world of Devas is used in general sense which includes that of Vayu. "Yo ayam pavathe Esha eva dhevanam grbah" Jaimini Upanishad. He who blows vayu is the house of devas.
Varunadhikaranam Suthra 3. "thatitho adhi varunah sambndhath" Beyond lightning there is Varuna because of connection.
In Kouisheetaki text it is said that the soul goes to the world of vayu, varuna, indhra,prajapathy and to the world of Brahman in that order. In chandhogya it is stated "Sam vath sarath Adhithyam, Adhithyath chandhramasam, chandhramasah vidhyutham.
Athivahikadhikaranam suthra 4.
Athivahikah thallingath.
They are those who guide thus being indicated. Now as to whether the light , vayu etc mentioned with respect to the progress of the soul towards Brahman are the landmarks indicating the paths to be persued or places of enjoyment. The suthra replies that they are not mere signposts to indicate the path, but the divinities ordained by the lord to guide the soul. this is known by the text.
"thathpurusho amanavah sa Enan brahma gamayathi." There is a divine person who leads them to Brahman.
Suthra 5. "Vaidhyuthe naivathah thacchrutheh." From there by him who belongs to lightening because of sruthi. Only the divine person guides the soul from the stage of lightening to Brahman. while the others like varuna and vayu assist the divine person.
Karyadhikaranam Suthra 6.
"Karyam badharirasya gathyupapattheh"
Suthra 7 "Viseshitha thvaccha"
Suthra 8 "Sameepyatthu thadhvyapadhesah"
Sutha 9 "Karyathyaye thadha Dhyakshena saha athat parama Bhidhanath"
Suthra 10 "Smrthesch"
Suthra 11"param jaiminih mukhyathvath."
Suthra 12 "dharsanath cha."
Suthra 13 "nacha karye prathya bhisandhih"
Suthra 14."Apratheeka lamba nath nayathi ithi badhnayanah ubhaya tha cha dhoshath thahkrathuscha."
suthra 15 "visesham cha dharsayathi."
The departed souls go by the path of Gods to Saguna Brahman.
To the Karya Brahman or Hiranya garbha or Saguna Brahman (the departed souls are led) (thus opines) the sage Baadari on account of the possibility of its being the goal (of their journey)
The Brahman to which the departed souls go by the path of the Gods is the Saguna Brahman. this is the opinion propounded in suthra 7-11 by Baadarayana. In suthra 12 - 14 Jaimini defends the opposite view according to which the soul of the upasaka goes to the highest Brahman, not to the karya brahman (Saguna Brahman) Jaiminis view is a mere purvapaksha, while Baadari's opinion represents the Siddhanta.
From smrithi also there is evidence that the souls in brahmaloka attain brahman at the end of the time known as 'Para' from the text "brahma nasahathe sarvesamprapthe parathi sanchare parasyanthe krthathmanah pavisanthi paramam paddham" at the dissolution all of them together with brahma enter the supreme abode.
The supreme Brahman only says Jaimini because of the primary meaning.
Jaimini is of the opinion that the deities lead only those who meditate on Brahman because of the text. 'thathpurusho amanavah sa enan brahma gamayathi' a divine person leads them to brahman, The primary sense of the word brahman being appropriate there is no need of resorting to the secondary meaning of hiranyagarbha. Even though Brahman is all pervading, the final realisation comes only by the reaching a particular place. From the text "tham Etham Vedhanu vachan Ena brahmana vividhrshanthi' it is known that the origination of knowledge depends on Varnasrama dharma, the duties of asrama and caste soucha, purity achara, good conduct and dhesakala place and time. The text "Esha samprasadho asmath sarirath samutthaya paramjyothi rupasampdhya svena rupena abhinishpadhyathe" now the serene one rising out of this body attains the supreme light and appears in his own true form declares that the individual self travelling through the devayana attains the supreme self.
From the text "Yasoham bhavami brahmananam'
I become the glory of the brahmanaas shows that the intention is to shed the ignorance and realise the supreme self.
From the text "asva ivaromani vidhooya papam chandhra iva rahormukhath pramuchya dhoothva, sariram akrtham krthathma brahmalokam abhisambhavami"
As a horse shakes his hair and as the worm frees himself from the mouth of Rahu having shaken off his body I may attain the eternal world of Brahman Therefore Jaimini says, the dieties beginning with Light lead only those who meditate on Brahman.
"Apratheeka Alamba nath nayathi ithi badharyana ubhayatha cha dhoshata thath krathuscha"
Badharayana declares his own views as the final conclusion. He says that both the views of badhari and Jaimini are defective. To say that the deities lead those who meditate on Hirarya garbha goes against the declaration of the sruthi "asmath sarirath samutthaya pram jyothirupasampadhya"
that the soul rising up from the body attains the supreme light, and the view of jaimini that they conduct only those who meditate on Supreme self will contradict the text "thadhya itthamvidhurye cheme aranya sraddha thapa ithyupasaltre the archisham abhisambhavanthi" those who have the knowledge of the five fires and those who meditate in the forest with faith and austerity go through the path of light also the law of thathkrathu means that after departing from the world one becomes that which he meditates on. So the meditator on brahman attains Brahman and not others, and the scriptures show the difference.
The text "Yavannamno bhavathi" He who meditates on the name as Brahman, for him there is movement as he wishes as far as name extends, shows that the fruit of meditation of those who meditate on symbols, beginning with name and ending with prana is of limited duration. The deities do not lead those who meditate on sentient mixed with insentient matter and only those who meditate on brahman or on the individual self seperated from prakrithi, having Brahman as its self are led by the deities through the path of light. This is the settled conclusion by Sri Ramanuja.
"api thu param brahmopa seenan athmakam cha prakrthi viyuklham brahmath makam upaseenan athivahiko gano hayatheethi siddham."
Sampadhyavirbhavadhi karanam.
Suthra 1.
"Sampadhyavirbhavah svena sabdhath"
After attaining Brahman the individual soul manifests in his own true nature which is known by "SVENA"
This padha discusses as a conclusion to the work the kind of existence the released souls enjoy.
Suthra 2
"Mukthah prathjnanath"
The serene soul rising from the body attains the supreme light manifests in its own true form.
Suthra 3.
"Athmaprakarnath"
It is self because of the context. "ya athma apahathpapma vijaro vimrthyuh visoko vijjghathso apipasah sathykamah sathya sankalpah."
The self who is free from sin, from old age, from death, from hunger and thirst and of true will and desire. So it is not origination but manifestation of the qualities already existing.
example of gunate of Bhagavan Sounaka is taken.
"yatha na kriyathe jyotsnamala prakshal ananmaneA, dhosha prahananna jnanam Athmanah Kriyathe thatha."
Just as by polishing a gem no new lustre is produced similarly by destruction of evil no knowledge is produced in the self but what is already there manifests.
Avibhagena Dhrshtath vadhikaranam.
Suthra 4. "Avibhagena dhrshtathvath"
Released self experiences brahman as inseperable from itself because it is seen to be so from the scriptures.
The released self experiences his own self as inseperable from Brahman. /scriptures declare that the individual self manifests in his true nature on attaining Brahman. The true nature is having Brahman as the innerself and the individual self standing in relation of mode to Brahman.
Sri Ramanuja quotes several texts such as 'thathvamasi' that thou art, 'ayam athma Brahma' this self is brahman, 'etahathmyam idham sarvam' all that is ensouled by that which show the relation between the individual self and the supreme self in co-ordination i.e. 'samanadhikaranya nirdhesath' and that the relation ship is one of sarira and sariri is known from the text, 'ya athmani thishtan athmanh anthaahyam Athma na vedha yasya athma sariram ya athmanam antharo yamayathi sa tha athma antharyamyamrthah'.
The passages describing the similarity with brahman means that as a mode the individual soul is equal to Brahman Hence there is no contradiction.
Brahmadhikaranam:
Suthra 5.
"Brahmena jaiminih upanyasa dhibhyah."
Jaimini is of the opinion that the released soul becomes like Brahman based on the scriptural statement to that effect.
Since the qualities ascribed to the individual self are the same qualities pertaining to brahman, Jaimini says the individual self manifests himself with the attributes of Brahman.
Suthra 6.
"Chithithan mAthrena thadhathmakathvath ithi aoudulomih"
Aoudulomi thinks that the released self manifests as mere consciousness because it is of this nature.
The text in Brhadharnyaka also declares the nature of the self to be of consciousness.
"Sayatha saindhavaganah anantharo abahyah krthsnah rasaghana eva evam va are ayam athm AamAsnatharO abahy ahkrthsnah prajanaghana Eva" As the lump of salt has neither inside nor outside but is homogeneous mass of salty taste. similarly this self is of consciousness through out. Hence aoudulomi says the essential nature of the self is of consciousness which manifests in the state of release.
Suthra 7. "Evamapyupa nyasath poorvabhavath avirodham badharayanah."
Because of the attributes mentioned earlier and statements to that effect there is no contradiction says Bodharayana and this view is cleared by a passage by Ramanuja.
"Yatha trasvathsu amraphaladhishu thvagadhi pradhesa bheduena rasabhedhe sathyapi saindha vaghanasya sarvathra Ekarasaikathnam, thatha athmanopi vijnAnasvaroopathuam, Svaprakase roopathvam ithyarthah" meaning: Just like mango and other tasteful fruits taste differently in different parts. The salt is salty throughout. Likewise the self is also of the nature of knowledge throughout or of self luminosity.
Sankalpadhikaranam.
Suthra 8 ; "Sankalpadhevathacchrotheh"
By mere will because the scriptures says so.
Suthra 9. "athaeva cha ananyadhi pathih"
And therefore there is no one as his Lord.
Abhavadhiakaranam
Suthra10. "abhavam badhariraha hyevam"
There is absence of body and senses for the realised self, because the scriptures say so.
Suthra 11. "bhavam jaiminih vikalpamananath"
because the text declares manifoldness the released soul has body and senses says Jaimini.
Suthra 12. "dvadhasah avath ubhayavidham badharayanah"
Badharayana says the released soul is of both kinds as in the case of twelve days sacrifice.
Badharayana holds the view of both above that the released soul can exist in both ways, that is with or without body by his will as in upaithi and yajathi. i.e. resorting to sacrifice.
Suthra 13. "thanvabha ve samdhyadhuthpattheh"
In the absence of a body it is possible as in dream, previously it has been said that the released soul can create a body at his will, the suthrakara says that it is not invariably created by the soul only, but as in dream a person experiences things created by the lord in released state also he can experience in the world created by the lord.
Suthra 14. "bhave jagradhvath"
When there is a body in the waking state, even when the individual soul creates a body by its own will through which he experiences joy of sport, as in waking state, still it falls under the realm of the will of the supreme self only.
Suthra 15. "prasdheep avathavesah thatha hi dharsayathi"
The entrance into many bodies of the released soul is like that of the lamp, thus the scriptures show example, just as a lamp existing in one place spreads its light all over, the individual soul though atomic pervades all the bodies through his attributive consciousness and makes them his own.
But this attributive consciousness dharma bhoothajnanam, which is one of the exclusive concepts of visistadvaita is contracted in the embodied state due to karma and attains its infinite proportions at the state of release. This is also stated in the scriptures.
"valagrasathabhagas yasathadha kalptithasyacha bhago jeevah sa vijneyah sa cha ananthyaya kalpathe" meaning a hundredth part of the pointof hair, divided into a hundred fold, one part of which is the size of the individual self and he is capable of infinity.
Suthra 16. "Svapyayas ampathy O haayath rapeksham avishkrutham hi"
It refers to deep sleep death as is shown by the scriptures. When the individual self reaches brahman all its inner and outer consciousness cease to exist. "Prajnene athaman a samparishvakthah na bahyam kin chana vedha nantharam"
Embraced by the omniscient self the individual soul knows nothing within and without, hence how can it be possible for the soul to have all pervading consciousness. The suthra replies the text quoted refer to the state of release but only to deep sleep or death, this is shown by "purushasya prayathah vangmanasi sam padhyante manah prane prana thejasi thejah parasyam dhevathayam."
When a man departs his speech merges in mind, mind in prana, prana in tejas and tejas in supreme self. That in deep sleep there is no consciousness -
"naha khalu ayam idham samprthyathmanam janathi ayam aham asmi ithi no eva imani bhoothani vinasam eva apeethah bhavathi."
He does not know himself as I am he nor indeed these beings. It seems as if he has gone to anhilation.
" Savaesha Ethena dhaivena chakshush amansa Ethan kaman pasyan ramathe ya ethe brahmaloke"
Through this divine eye in the mind experiences all desired objects which are in the world of Brahman.
Brdharanyaka the absence of consciousness is mentioned in death. "Ethebhyah bhoothebhyahbsamurthaya thanyeva nuvinasyathI."
rising up from these elements he goes to destruction after them, it only means he does not perceive, therefore it means to state deep sleep and death.
Jagathvyaparavarjad hikaranam.
Suthra 17. "jagathvya paravajam prakar anath asannihithathvaccha"
The released souls possess all powers of the lord, except cosmic activity, because of subject matter and non proximity.
The view of the poorvapakshin is that, the released soul attains equality with the supreme self as denoted in "niranjanah paramam samyam upaithi"
free from taint he attains highest equality and also because it is mentioned that such soul accquires the power of realising all its desires which is possible only with omnipotence.
The suthra refutes this view and says that the released self acquires all the powers of the supreme self except the control of the cosmos. The individual self becoming free from all karmas that conceals his true nature, acquires the power to percieve the essential nature of Brahman intutively but does not possess the power of controlling the world of beings. This is known from "yathova imani bhoothani jayanthyena jathani jeevanthi yasmin abhisamvisanthi" from whom all these beings emerge by whom they are sustained and into whom they merge back denotes that the Brahman alone has the power to create, sustain and annihilate the world of sentient and insentient beings. This would not be considered as the definition of Brahman if the released souls also contain this power. also.
"Sadheva soumya idham agra aseeth Ekameva adhvi theeyam thadhaik shatha bahusyam para jay eya." "thallhejo asyatha" meaning all this was sath only in the beginning, one only without a second. It willed to become many and it created the fire. Moreover in the context where Brahman is spoken of as the controlling power of the world the individual self is nowhere mentioned as having these powers.
Suthra 18. "prathyakshopadhe sath na ithi cheth na adhi kari kamandal astha utitheh" If it is said that it is not so because of direct statement, it is not so, because the text refers to the enjoyment of that within the spheres of special deities.
The Poorvapakshin quotes the text "Sasvarat bhavathi thasya sareshu lokeshukama charo bhavathi" He is self ruler and moves in all the worlds according to his desire, to prove that the cosmic activity belongs to the released soul. But this the suthra refutes saying that what is implied in the text is the released soul enjoys freely in all the worlds, which are under the control of the deities appointed by Brahman, where the power of Brahman is fully manifest.
Suthra 19 "Vikarva thi cha thatha histhithim Aha"
Brahman is beyond all change and the scriptures declare that the self abides in Brahman.
To the objection that if the released soul also confined to certain regions of enjoyment then there is no difference between that state and that of bondage. The suthra replies that the scriptures declare that the released soul abides in Brahman as the enjoyer. Sri Ramanuja explains this as "nirdhootha nikhila Vikaramnikhila heyaprathyaneeka kalyanai kathanam nirathisay anandham param brahma savibhoothikam sakala kalyanaguna anubhava thi mukthah; thadhvibhoothyantha rgathathvena vikaravarthivam lokanam api muktha bhogyathvam." meaning the supreme self which is free from all change and free from evil and abode of all auspicious qualities along with its manifestations of glory is the object of enjoyment for the released soul. Even the worlds which are subject to change also being included in the manifestation of the glory of Brahman become the object of experience for the released soul.
"Yadha hyaivesha Ethasmin adhrsye anathmye anirukthe anilayane abhayam prathishtam vindhathe atha so abhayam gatho bhavati."
When he abides in that which is invisible without a body undefined, unsupported, then he has attained the fearless, mentions Brahman to be the abode of the released soul. that the whole world is the manifestation of His glory is known from the text "thasmin lokah sthithahsarve thadhu nathy Ethikaschana" on Him the world rests and no one goes beyond Him.
Therefore the meaning of the passage begining with "sa svarat bhavathi" says Ramanuja, is that the released soul, the conscious of Brahman and His glories experiences the objects which he within the limited sphere of Hiranyagarbha and the like and does not indicate the powers of controlling the universe on the part of the individual soul, because they exclusively belong to the Lord.
Suthra 20."dharsayat haschaivam prathyaksha numane."
And thus sruthi and smrithi show Prathyaksha refers to sruthi and anumana to smrithi. The text such as
"bheesha smath vathah pavathe bheeshadhethi suryah bheeshasmath agnih cha indhrascha mrthyur dhavathi panchamah." Which means that from the fear of him the wind blows the sun goes, the fire, Indhra and Yama do their work and. "EthasyEva aksharasya prasasane gargi surya chandrama sou vidhaothou thisht athah" By the command of this imperishable one, oh gargi, the sun, the moon stand apart, shows him to be the controller of the universe. The smrithi also confirms this as could be seen in the Gita. "Mayadhyakshena prakrthih sooyathe sacharacharam" Under my control the prakrthi gives birth to sentient and in sentient beings.
Both sruthi and smrithi declare that the supreme self is the cause of the bliss enjoyed in the state of release. He alone causes bliss. "Esha hyevanandhayethi"
and also
"mam cha yo avya bhichar Enabhakt hiyogena sevathe sa gunan samatheethyaithan brahmbhooyaya kalpathE brahma No hi prathishtaham amrthasya sukhasyaik anthikasyacha"
He who serves me with unswerving devotion he surpasses the gunas and becomes qualified to attain Brahman. I am the abode of the immortal Brahman of eternal dharma and absolute bliss.
The qualities like Freedom from evil etc. are of essential nature of the realised soul neverthe less depends upon Brahman as well as their permanency. Thus the equality with the Lord of the released soul does not extend to the cosmic activity.
Suthra 21."bhogamath rasamyaling accha" and because if the indication of equality with enjoyment only became "so asnuthe sarvan kaman sahabrahmaNa vipaschitha" He attains all objects of desire together with the all knowing Brahman denotes that the equality of the released soul with Brahman is only with respect to mere enjoyment. Thus in accordance with the texts mentioning Brahman to be the sole controller of the universe, it is concluded that the power of the released soul is devoid of cosmic activity.
Suthra 22. "anAvatthi sabdhath anavitthin Sabdhathh"
There is no return because the scriptures say so. This repetition denotes the end of the sasthra.
To the question that if the power and the glory of the released soul depends on the will of the supreme self, will there be a possibility of return to the world, by the soul thus released. The suthra answers that it is not so.
Sri Ramanuja explains this as:
"Yatha nikhila heyaprathyaneekakalyaNa ikathanah jagajjanmadhikaranam samastha vasthyuvilak shaNah sawajnah sathya sankalpah Asrithvath salyai kaj ala dhih parama karunikah nirastha samAbhya Dhika Sambha vanah parabrahma bhidhanah parama purusho asthi ithi sabdhath avagamyathE. Evam aharah anushteeyam Ana var Nasramadharma anugraheetha ThadhupAsanar upa thathsam ArAdhanpree thah upaseenan anadhikala pravrttha anantha dhusthara karmo sanchaye rupa avidhyam vinivarthya sva yatha thmyarupa anavadhika athisayanandham prapayya punarn Avarthayathee thyapi sabdha ath Eva avagamyathe."
meaning:- Only through scriptures it is known that there is a supreme self, who is free from all evil, source of all auspicious qualities, the cause of the world, different from everything else, omniscient, true willed, the ocean of love to those who take refuge in Him, who has infinite mercy, to whom there is none equal or superior and who is known as the Parabrahman. Similarly from the scriptures alone we come to know that the supreme purusha who is pleased with those who follow the Varanashrama dharma every day and meditate on Him, and worship Him, destroys the nescience which is otherwise difficult to overcome, and bestows infinite bliss that enables them to experience Him in His true essential nature and he does not cause their return to samsara.
The scriptual evidence to this is quoted in the text of Chandogy Upanishad. "Sa khalu evam varthayan yavadhayushanm brahmalokam abhisampadhyathE"
He thus indeed lives lives throughout life, attains the world of Brahman and never returns again.
Smrthi states also "Abrahmabuvana lokah punar avrtthino arjuna mamupethya thu Kountheya punarjanma na vidhyathe"
All the worlds upto that of Brahma are subject to return, but attaining me there is no birth again.
"na cha ucchinn akarmabandha sya asanku- chithajna nasya a parabrahmanubhavaik a svabhavasya thadhekapriyasya anavadhik athisaya anandham brahma anubhavathah anya peksha athadhartha rambhadh yasambhavath punara vrtthi shanka, na cha parampurushah sathya sankalpa athyartha priyam, jnaninam labdhava kadhachith avarthayishyathi." meaning:
That is for the released soul who has destroyed all his karma, his knowledge being expanded to its real form, his nature established in the experience of Brahman cannot have any posible desire and no work to be undertaken on that account. The Lord who is of infallible will make his most dear devotee return to samsara again. this has been the promise made by the Lord himself.
In the Gita He says
"Priyo hi jnanin o athyartham aham sa cha mama priyah; Udhara sarva Evaithe jnanee thvath maiva me matham; asthithassa hi yuktha thma mam Eva nutthamam gathim. bahoonam janmanam anthe jnanvan mam prapadhyathe vasudhevassasarvam ithi sa makathma sudhurlabhah."
I am very dear to a jnani and he is dear to me. All these are great meaning arthtee the suffering, artharthee, one who yeans for something, jijnasu, one who is desirous of knowledge, but janani a man of knowledge is myself. It is because having his mind integrated in me alone he resorts to me as his highest goal. A man of knowledge reaches me after many births, and such a man for whom Vasudeva is everything is a very rare occurance.
Also Bhagavan Himself has stated ; those great minds after reaching me do not come again to birth and take up a body that is perishable and full of misery, for they have reached the highest goal. The worlds including the abode of Brahma are perishable and one that goes to them must return to rebirth. But for one that comes to me there is no rebirth.
Also there is no room to suspect that the freed jiva will ever return. First he will not himself desire it, for his bondage to karma has been broken, his attribute Jnana has fully expanded. His nature is to enjoy the highest Athma alone. that alone is dear to him and he is enjoying Brahman who is bliss without limit. How can he desire anything else and make efforts to procure it. Next the highest Athma will never send him back after having taken immense trouble to get him to Himself, for the jiva is immeasurably dear to Him. To the Jnani one that loves me for myself I am immesurably dear and he is dear to me. The janani is in reality my Athma for he regards me only as the highest goal and there is no one that can oppose Him. When he wishes to keep the Jiva for His will is never frustrated, Vasudeva is everything to him. Such a great mind is a rare occurance. Paripurna Brahma Anubhavam.
Srimathe Vedantha Ramanujaya
Maha Desikaya Namaha.
Ans:Archiradhyadhikaranam
Suthra 1. "Archiradhina thathpra thitheh."
The self of the knower reaches Brahman through the path of light as is known from the scriptures.
The path through which the soul of a knower of Brahman passes and attains Brahman.
"atha yadhuchaivasmin cchavyam kurvanthiiyadhi cha na, archisham Eva abhisambhavanthi, archishah ahah, ahnah, Apooryam Ana paksham, Apooryamana pakshath yan shadudhang Ethi masan, Tnanm Asebhyah samvathsaram, samvathsarath Adhithyam, AdhithyAt h Chandhramasam chandramasah vidhyutham tath purusho amanavaha Enan brahma gamayathi Esha dhevapathah brahmapathah Ethena prathipadhyam AnAima m manavam Avartham nAvarthanthe."
meaning: Now as from such persons, that is the knower's of Brahman whether the cremation rites are performed or not. They go to light, from light to the day, from the day to the bright fortnight, from the bright fortnight to the six months of uttarayana, from that to the year, from the year to the sun, from the sun to the moon, from the moon to the lightening when a person from the region of Brahma comes and guides them to realize Brahman. Those who go by this path do not return to this mortal world.
"atha yathra asmath sarira thuthkra mathi atha Ethair eva rasmibhih oordhvam akramathe yavath ksipye thmanahthavath Adhithyam gacchathi; Ethadhvai khalulO Kadhvaram vidhusham"
meaning: When he departs from the body he proceeds upwards through these very rays as long as it takes the mind to travel in that short time he goes to the sun that indeed is the door to the world of Brahman for the knowers. These passages are from Chandhogya Upanishad.
Kousheetaki Upanishad's version is
"Sa Etham dhevayanam pan thanam Apadhya agni lokam agacchathisa vayu lokam, sa varuna lokam, sa indhra lokam, sa prajapathi lokam sa brahma lokam."
Thus the journey is described as from devayana to world of fire, that of air, that of water, that of Indhra, and that of Brahma, the creator and from there to brahma loka.
The poorva pakshin presents a view that these roads are several and independent. This is refuted by the suthra. All roads are one, that of light only and the differences in description is only due to the details. As the divinities mentioned are the same they differ only in minor points.
Suthra 2 Vayvadhikaranam.
"Vayumabdha th avisesh abhyam."
From the year to vayu because of general and specific words.
The different texts describing the path of the man of knowledge, though are of same content, the order of the places reached seem to differ in each.
In Chandhogya the soul is said to reach the month, year and the sun in that order. While in Brhadharanyaka the order is given as the month, the world of the devas and the sun respectively. Since the path is the same according to both texts.
In Brhadharanyaka there is another passage that states, when a man departs from this world he goes to the air, who makes for him an opening like wheel of a chariot through which he proceeds upwards and comes to the sun.
In Kousheetaki text the world of vayu is after that of agni, light and before the world of devas. Here it is argued that the world of vayu has to be placed before Sun agni etc. Then it is also argued that the world of the devas and the world of Vayu is the same. Then it is proved that the world of Devas is used in general sense which includes that of Vayu. "Yo ayam pavathe Esha eva dhevanam grbah" Jaimini Upanishad. He who blows vayu is the house of devas.
Varunadhikaranam Suthra 3. "thatitho adhi varunah sambndhath" Beyond lightning there is Varuna because of connection.
In Kouisheetaki text it is said that the soul goes to the world of vayu, varuna, indhra,prajapathy and to the world of Brahman in that order. In chandhogya it is stated "Sam vath sarath Adhithyam, Adhithyath chandhramasam, chandhramasah vidhyutham.
Athivahikadhikaranam suthra 4.
Athivahikah thallingath.
They are those who guide thus being indicated. Now as to whether the light , vayu etc mentioned with respect to the progress of the soul towards Brahman are the landmarks indicating the paths to be persued or places of enjoyment. The suthra replies that they are not mere signposts to indicate the path, but the divinities ordained by the lord to guide the soul. this is known by the text.
"thathpurusho amanavah sa Enan brahma gamayathi." There is a divine person who leads them to Brahman.
Suthra 5. "Vaidhyuthe naivathah thacchrutheh." From there by him who belongs to lightening because of sruthi. Only the divine person guides the soul from the stage of lightening to Brahman. while the others like varuna and vayu assist the divine person.
Karyadhikaranam Suthra 6.
"Karyam badharirasya gathyupapattheh"
Suthra 7 "Viseshitha thvaccha"
Suthra 8 "Sameepyatthu thadhvyapadhesah"
Sutha 9 "Karyathyaye thadha Dhyakshena saha athat parama Bhidhanath"
Suthra 10 "Smrthesch"
Suthra 11"param jaiminih mukhyathvath."
Suthra 12 "dharsanath cha."
Suthra 13 "nacha karye prathya bhisandhih"
Suthra 14."Apratheeka lamba nath nayathi ithi badhnayanah ubhaya tha cha dhoshath thahkrathuscha."
suthra 15 "visesham cha dharsayathi."
The departed souls go by the path of Gods to Saguna Brahman.
To the Karya Brahman or Hiranya garbha or Saguna Brahman (the departed souls are led) (thus opines) the sage Baadari on account of the possibility of its being the goal (of their journey)
The Brahman to which the departed souls go by the path of the Gods is the Saguna Brahman. this is the opinion propounded in suthra 7-11 by Baadarayana. In suthra 12 - 14 Jaimini defends the opposite view according to which the soul of the upasaka goes to the highest Brahman, not to the karya brahman (Saguna Brahman) Jaiminis view is a mere purvapaksha, while Baadari's opinion represents the Siddhanta.
From smrithi also there is evidence that the souls in brahmaloka attain brahman at the end of the time known as 'Para' from the text "brahma nasahathe sarvesamprapthe parathi sanchare parasyanthe krthathmanah pavisanthi paramam paddham" at the dissolution all of them together with brahma enter the supreme abode.
The supreme Brahman only says Jaimini because of the primary meaning.
Jaimini is of the opinion that the deities lead only those who meditate on Brahman because of the text. 'thathpurusho amanavah sa enan brahma gamayathi' a divine person leads them to brahman, The primary sense of the word brahman being appropriate there is no need of resorting to the secondary meaning of hiranyagarbha. Even though Brahman is all pervading, the final realisation comes only by the reaching a particular place. From the text "tham Etham Vedhanu vachan Ena brahmana vividhrshanthi' it is known that the origination of knowledge depends on Varnasrama dharma, the duties of asrama and caste soucha, purity achara, good conduct and dhesakala place and time. The text "Esha samprasadho asmath sarirath samutthaya paramjyothi rupasampdhya svena rupena abhinishpadhyathe" now the serene one rising out of this body attains the supreme light and appears in his own true form declares that the individual self travelling through the devayana attains the supreme self.
From the text "Yasoham bhavami brahmananam'
I become the glory of the brahmanaas shows that the intention is to shed the ignorance and realise the supreme self.
From the text "asva ivaromani vidhooya papam chandhra iva rahormukhath pramuchya dhoothva, sariram akrtham krthathma brahmalokam abhisambhavami"
As a horse shakes his hair and as the worm frees himself from the mouth of Rahu having shaken off his body I may attain the eternal world of Brahman Therefore Jaimini says, the dieties beginning with Light lead only those who meditate on Brahman.
"Apratheeka Alamba nath nayathi ithi badharyana ubhayatha cha dhoshata thath krathuscha"
Badharayana declares his own views as the final conclusion. He says that both the views of badhari and Jaimini are defective. To say that the deities lead those who meditate on Hirarya garbha goes against the declaration of the sruthi "asmath sarirath samutthaya pram jyothirupasampadhya"
that the soul rising up from the body attains the supreme light, and the view of jaimini that they conduct only those who meditate on Supreme self will contradict the text "thadhya itthamvidhurye cheme aranya sraddha thapa ithyupasaltre the archisham abhisambhavanthi" those who have the knowledge of the five fires and those who meditate in the forest with faith and austerity go through the path of light also the law of thathkrathu means that after departing from the world one becomes that which he meditates on. So the meditator on brahman attains Brahman and not others, and the scriptures show the difference.
The text "Yavannamno bhavathi" He who meditates on the name as Brahman, for him there is movement as he wishes as far as name extends, shows that the fruit of meditation of those who meditate on symbols, beginning with name and ending with prana is of limited duration. The deities do not lead those who meditate on sentient mixed with insentient matter and only those who meditate on brahman or on the individual self seperated from prakrithi, having Brahman as its self are led by the deities through the path of light. This is the settled conclusion by Sri Ramanuja.
"api thu param brahmopa seenan athmakam cha prakrthi viyuklham brahmath makam upaseenan athivahiko gano hayatheethi siddham."
Sampadhyavirbhavadhi karanam.
Suthra 1.
"Sampadhyavirbhavah svena sabdhath"
After attaining Brahman the individual soul manifests in his own true nature which is known by "SVENA"
This padha discusses as a conclusion to the work the kind of existence the released souls enjoy.
Suthra 2
"Mukthah prathjnanath"
The serene soul rising from the body attains the supreme light manifests in its own true form.
Suthra 3.
"Athmaprakarnath"
It is self because of the context. "ya athma apahathpapma vijaro vimrthyuh visoko vijjghathso apipasah sathykamah sathya sankalpah."
The self who is free from sin, from old age, from death, from hunger and thirst and of true will and desire. So it is not origination but manifestation of the qualities already existing.
example of gunate of Bhagavan Sounaka is taken.
"yatha na kriyathe jyotsnamala prakshal ananmaneA, dhosha prahananna jnanam Athmanah Kriyathe thatha."
Just as by polishing a gem no new lustre is produced similarly by destruction of evil no knowledge is produced in the self but what is already there manifests.
Avibhagena Dhrshtath vadhikaranam.
Suthra 4. "Avibhagena dhrshtathvath"
Released self experiences brahman as inseperable from itself because it is seen to be so from the scriptures.
The released self experiences his own self as inseperable from Brahman. /scriptures declare that the individual self manifests in his true nature on attaining Brahman. The true nature is having Brahman as the innerself and the individual self standing in relation of mode to Brahman.
Sri Ramanuja quotes several texts such as 'thathvamasi' that thou art, 'ayam athma Brahma' this self is brahman, 'etahathmyam idham sarvam' all that is ensouled by that which show the relation between the individual self and the supreme self in co-ordination i.e. 'samanadhikaranya nirdhesath' and that the relation ship is one of sarira and sariri is known from the text, 'ya athmani thishtan athmanh anthaahyam Athma na vedha yasya athma sariram ya athmanam antharo yamayathi sa tha athma antharyamyamrthah'.
The passages describing the similarity with brahman means that as a mode the individual soul is equal to Brahman Hence there is no contradiction.
Brahmadhikaranam:
Suthra 5.
"Brahmena jaiminih upanyasa dhibhyah."
Jaimini is of the opinion that the released soul becomes like Brahman based on the scriptural statement to that effect.
Since the qualities ascribed to the individual self are the same qualities pertaining to brahman, Jaimini says the individual self manifests himself with the attributes of Brahman.
Suthra 6.
"Chithithan mAthrena thadhathmakathvath ithi aoudulomih"
Aoudulomi thinks that the released self manifests as mere consciousness because it is of this nature.
The text in Brhadharnyaka also declares the nature of the self to be of consciousness.
"Sayatha saindhavaganah anantharo abahyah krthsnah rasaghana eva evam va are ayam athm AamAsnatharO abahy ahkrthsnah prajanaghana Eva" As the lump of salt has neither inside nor outside but is homogeneous mass of salty taste. similarly this self is of consciousness through out. Hence aoudulomi says the essential nature of the self is of consciousness which manifests in the state of release.
Suthra 7. "Evamapyupa nyasath poorvabhavath avirodham badharayanah."
Because of the attributes mentioned earlier and statements to that effect there is no contradiction says Bodharayana and this view is cleared by a passage by Ramanuja.
"Yatha trasvathsu amraphaladhishu thvagadhi pradhesa bheduena rasabhedhe sathyapi saindha vaghanasya sarvathra Ekarasaikathnam, thatha athmanopi vijnAnasvaroopathuam, Svaprakase roopathvam ithyarthah" meaning: Just like mango and other tasteful fruits taste differently in different parts. The salt is salty throughout. Likewise the self is also of the nature of knowledge throughout or of self luminosity.
Sankalpadhikaranam.
Suthra 8 ; "Sankalpadhevathacchrotheh"
By mere will because the scriptures says so.
Suthra 9. "athaeva cha ananyadhi pathih"
And therefore there is no one as his Lord.
Abhavadhiakaranam
Suthra10. "abhavam badhariraha hyevam"
There is absence of body and senses for the realised self, because the scriptures say so.
Suthra 11. "bhavam jaiminih vikalpamananath"
because the text declares manifoldness the released soul has body and senses says Jaimini.
Suthra 12. "dvadhasah avath ubhayavidham badharayanah"
Badharayana says the released soul is of both kinds as in the case of twelve days sacrifice.
Badharayana holds the view of both above that the released soul can exist in both ways, that is with or without body by his will as in upaithi and yajathi. i.e. resorting to sacrifice.
Suthra 13. "thanvabha ve samdhyadhuthpattheh"
In the absence of a body it is possible as in dream, previously it has been said that the released soul can create a body at his will, the suthrakara says that it is not invariably created by the soul only, but as in dream a person experiences things created by the lord in released state also he can experience in the world created by the lord.
Suthra 14. "bhave jagradhvath"
When there is a body in the waking state, even when the individual soul creates a body by its own will through which he experiences joy of sport, as in waking state, still it falls under the realm of the will of the supreme self only.
Suthra 15. "prasdheep avathavesah thatha hi dharsayathi"
The entrance into many bodies of the released soul is like that of the lamp, thus the scriptures show example, just as a lamp existing in one place spreads its light all over, the individual soul though atomic pervades all the bodies through his attributive consciousness and makes them his own.
But this attributive consciousness dharma bhoothajnanam, which is one of the exclusive concepts of visistadvaita is contracted in the embodied state due to karma and attains its infinite proportions at the state of release. This is also stated in the scriptures.
"valagrasathabhagas yasathadha kalptithasyacha bhago jeevah sa vijneyah sa cha ananthyaya kalpathe" meaning a hundredth part of the pointof hair, divided into a hundred fold, one part of which is the size of the individual self and he is capable of infinity.
Suthra 16. "Svapyayas ampathy O haayath rapeksham avishkrutham hi"
It refers to deep sleep death as is shown by the scriptures. When the individual self reaches brahman all its inner and outer consciousness cease to exist. "Prajnene athaman a samparishvakthah na bahyam kin chana vedha nantharam"
Embraced by the omniscient self the individual soul knows nothing within and without, hence how can it be possible for the soul to have all pervading consciousness. The suthra replies the text quoted refer to the state of release but only to deep sleep or death, this is shown by "purushasya prayathah vangmanasi sam padhyante manah prane prana thejasi thejah parasyam dhevathayam."
When a man departs his speech merges in mind, mind in prana, prana in tejas and tejas in supreme self. That in deep sleep there is no consciousness -
"naha khalu ayam idham samprthyathmanam janathi ayam aham asmi ithi no eva imani bhoothani vinasam eva apeethah bhavathi."
He does not know himself as I am he nor indeed these beings. It seems as if he has gone to anhilation.
" Savaesha Ethena dhaivena chakshush amansa Ethan kaman pasyan ramathe ya ethe brahmaloke"
Through this divine eye in the mind experiences all desired objects which are in the world of Brahman.
Brdharanyaka the absence of consciousness is mentioned in death. "Ethebhyah bhoothebhyahbsamurthaya thanyeva nuvinasyathI."
rising up from these elements he goes to destruction after them, it only means he does not perceive, therefore it means to state deep sleep and death.
Jagathvyaparavarjad hikaranam.
Suthra 17. "jagathvya paravajam prakar anath asannihithathvaccha"
The released souls possess all powers of the lord, except cosmic activity, because of subject matter and non proximity.
The view of the poorvapakshin is that, the released soul attains equality with the supreme self as denoted in "niranjanah paramam samyam upaithi"
free from taint he attains highest equality and also because it is mentioned that such soul accquires the power of realising all its desires which is possible only with omnipotence.
The suthra refutes this view and says that the released self acquires all the powers of the supreme self except the control of the cosmos. The individual self becoming free from all karmas that conceals his true nature, acquires the power to percieve the essential nature of Brahman intutively but does not possess the power of controlling the world of beings. This is known from "yathova imani bhoothani jayanthyena jathani jeevanthi yasmin abhisamvisanthi" from whom all these beings emerge by whom they are sustained and into whom they merge back denotes that the Brahman alone has the power to create, sustain and annihilate the world of sentient and insentient beings. This would not be considered as the definition of Brahman if the released souls also contain this power. also.
"Sadheva soumya idham agra aseeth Ekameva adhvi theeyam thadhaik shatha bahusyam para jay eya." "thallhejo asyatha" meaning all this was sath only in the beginning, one only without a second. It willed to become many and it created the fire. Moreover in the context where Brahman is spoken of as the controlling power of the world the individual self is nowhere mentioned as having these powers.
Suthra 18. "prathyakshopadhe sath na ithi cheth na adhi kari kamandal astha utitheh" If it is said that it is not so because of direct statement, it is not so, because the text refers to the enjoyment of that within the spheres of special deities.
The Poorvapakshin quotes the text "Sasvarat bhavathi thasya sareshu lokeshukama charo bhavathi" He is self ruler and moves in all the worlds according to his desire, to prove that the cosmic activity belongs to the released soul. But this the suthra refutes saying that what is implied in the text is the released soul enjoys freely in all the worlds, which are under the control of the deities appointed by Brahman, where the power of Brahman is fully manifest.
Suthra 19 "Vikarva thi cha thatha histhithim Aha"
Brahman is beyond all change and the scriptures declare that the self abides in Brahman.
To the objection that if the released soul also confined to certain regions of enjoyment then there is no difference between that state and that of bondage. The suthra replies that the scriptures declare that the released soul abides in Brahman as the enjoyer. Sri Ramanuja explains this as "nirdhootha nikhila Vikaramnikhila heyaprathyaneeka kalyanai kathanam nirathisay anandham param brahma savibhoothikam sakala kalyanaguna anubhava thi mukthah; thadhvibhoothyantha rgathathvena vikaravarthivam lokanam api muktha bhogyathvam." meaning the supreme self which is free from all change and free from evil and abode of all auspicious qualities along with its manifestations of glory is the object of enjoyment for the released soul. Even the worlds which are subject to change also being included in the manifestation of the glory of Brahman become the object of experience for the released soul.
"Yadha hyaivesha Ethasmin adhrsye anathmye anirukthe anilayane abhayam prathishtam vindhathe atha so abhayam gatho bhavati."
When he abides in that which is invisible without a body undefined, unsupported, then he has attained the fearless, mentions Brahman to be the abode of the released soul. that the whole world is the manifestation of His glory is known from the text "thasmin lokah sthithahsarve thadhu nathy Ethikaschana" on Him the world rests and no one goes beyond Him.
Therefore the meaning of the passage begining with "sa svarat bhavathi" says Ramanuja, is that the released soul, the conscious of Brahman and His glories experiences the objects which he within the limited sphere of Hiranyagarbha and the like and does not indicate the powers of controlling the universe on the part of the individual soul, because they exclusively belong to the Lord.
Suthra 20."dharsayat haschaivam prathyaksha numane."
And thus sruthi and smrithi show Prathyaksha refers to sruthi and anumana to smrithi. The text such as
"bheesha smath vathah pavathe bheeshadhethi suryah bheeshasmath agnih cha indhrascha mrthyur dhavathi panchamah." Which means that from the fear of him the wind blows the sun goes, the fire, Indhra and Yama do their work and. "EthasyEva aksharasya prasasane gargi surya chandrama sou vidhaothou thisht athah" By the command of this imperishable one, oh gargi, the sun, the moon stand apart, shows him to be the controller of the universe. The smrithi also confirms this as could be seen in the Gita. "Mayadhyakshena prakrthih sooyathe sacharacharam" Under my control the prakrthi gives birth to sentient and in sentient beings.
Both sruthi and smrithi declare that the supreme self is the cause of the bliss enjoyed in the state of release. He alone causes bliss. "Esha hyevanandhayethi"
and also
"mam cha yo avya bhichar Enabhakt hiyogena sevathe sa gunan samatheethyaithan brahmbhooyaya kalpathE brahma No hi prathishtaham amrthasya sukhasyaik anthikasyacha"
He who serves me with unswerving devotion he surpasses the gunas and becomes qualified to attain Brahman. I am the abode of the immortal Brahman of eternal dharma and absolute bliss.
The qualities like Freedom from evil etc. are of essential nature of the realised soul neverthe less depends upon Brahman as well as their permanency. Thus the equality with the Lord of the released soul does not extend to the cosmic activity.
Suthra 21."bhogamath rasamyaling accha" and because if the indication of equality with enjoyment only became "so asnuthe sarvan kaman sahabrahmaNa vipaschitha" He attains all objects of desire together with the all knowing Brahman denotes that the equality of the released soul with Brahman is only with respect to mere enjoyment. Thus in accordance with the texts mentioning Brahman to be the sole controller of the universe, it is concluded that the power of the released soul is devoid of cosmic activity.
Suthra 22. "anAvatthi sabdhath anavitthin Sabdhathh"
There is no return because the scriptures say so. This repetition denotes the end of the sasthra.
To the question that if the power and the glory of the released soul depends on the will of the supreme self, will there be a possibility of return to the world, by the soul thus released. The suthra answers that it is not so.
Sri Ramanuja explains this as:
"Yatha nikhila heyaprathyaneekakalyaNa ikathanah jagajjanmadhikaranam samastha vasthyuvilak shaNah sawajnah sathya sankalpah Asrithvath salyai kaj ala dhih parama karunikah nirastha samAbhya Dhika Sambha vanah parabrahma bhidhanah parama purusho asthi ithi sabdhath avagamyathE. Evam aharah anushteeyam Ana var Nasramadharma anugraheetha ThadhupAsanar upa thathsam ArAdhanpree thah upaseenan anadhikala pravrttha anantha dhusthara karmo sanchaye rupa avidhyam vinivarthya sva yatha thmyarupa anavadhika athisayanandham prapayya punarn Avarthayathee thyapi sabdha ath Eva avagamyathe."
meaning:- Only through scriptures it is known that there is a supreme self, who is free from all evil, source of all auspicious qualities, the cause of the world, different from everything else, omniscient, true willed, the ocean of love to those who take refuge in Him, who has infinite mercy, to whom there is none equal or superior and who is known as the Parabrahman. Similarly from the scriptures alone we come to know that the supreme purusha who is pleased with those who follow the Varanashrama dharma every day and meditate on Him, and worship Him, destroys the nescience which is otherwise difficult to overcome, and bestows infinite bliss that enables them to experience Him in His true essential nature and he does not cause their return to samsara.
The scriptual evidence to this is quoted in the text of Chandogy Upanishad. "Sa khalu evam varthayan yavadhayushanm brahmalokam abhisampadhyathE"
He thus indeed lives lives throughout life, attains the world of Brahman and never returns again.
Smrthi states also "Abrahmabuvana lokah punar avrtthino arjuna mamupethya thu Kountheya punarjanma na vidhyathe"
All the worlds upto that of Brahma are subject to return, but attaining me there is no birth again.
"na cha ucchinn akarmabandha sya asanku- chithajna nasya a parabrahmanubhavaik a svabhavasya thadhekapriyasya anavadhik athisaya anandham brahma anubhavathah anya peksha athadhartha rambhadh yasambhavath punara vrtthi shanka, na cha parampurushah sathya sankalpa athyartha priyam, jnaninam labdhava kadhachith avarthayishyathi." meaning:
That is for the released soul who has destroyed all his karma, his knowledge being expanded to its real form, his nature established in the experience of Brahman cannot have any posible desire and no work to be undertaken on that account. The Lord who is of infallible will make his most dear devotee return to samsara again. this has been the promise made by the Lord himself.
In the Gita He says
"Priyo hi jnanin o athyartham aham sa cha mama priyah; Udhara sarva Evaithe jnanee thvath maiva me matham; asthithassa hi yuktha thma mam Eva nutthamam gathim. bahoonam janmanam anthe jnanvan mam prapadhyathe vasudhevassasarvam ithi sa makathma sudhurlabhah."
I am very dear to a jnani and he is dear to me. All these are great meaning arthtee the suffering, artharthee, one who yeans for something, jijnasu, one who is desirous of knowledge, but janani a man of knowledge is myself. It is because having his mind integrated in me alone he resorts to me as his highest goal. A man of knowledge reaches me after many births, and such a man for whom Vasudeva is everything is a very rare occurance.
Also Bhagavan Himself has stated ; those great minds after reaching me do not come again to birth and take up a body that is perishable and full of misery, for they have reached the highest goal. The worlds including the abode of Brahma are perishable and one that goes to them must return to rebirth. But for one that comes to me there is no rebirth.
Also there is no room to suspect that the freed jiva will ever return. First he will not himself desire it, for his bondage to karma has been broken, his attribute Jnana has fully expanded. His nature is to enjoy the highest Athma alone. that alone is dear to him and he is enjoying Brahman who is bliss without limit. How can he desire anything else and make efforts to procure it. Next the highest Athma will never send him back after having taken immense trouble to get him to Himself, for the jiva is immeasurably dear to Him. To the Jnani one that loves me for myself I am immesurably dear and he is dear to me. The janani is in reality my Athma for he regards me only as the highest goal and there is no one that can oppose Him. When he wishes to keep the Jiva for His will is never frustrated, Vasudeva is everything to him. Such a great mind is a rare occurance. Paripurna Brahma Anubhavam.
Srimathe Vedantha Ramanujaya
Maha Desikaya Namaha.