The astronomical code in the organisation of the rig veda provides strong evidence that the vedic astronomers made careful observations of the sun the moon and the planets in the third millennium B.C. the knowledge is believed to be described in the earliest siddhantha which is no longer available. there is enough evidence to prove the equivalances between the outer world and the design of the texts.
There are a large number of astronomical references in the Vedic texts. The Satapatha Br¯ahman ´ . a gives the names of twenty seven naks.atras and an equal number of upa-naks.atras. On the other hand, the Taittir¯ıya, the Atharva, the K¯at.haka and the Maitr¯ayan.¯ı Sam. hit¯as give the names of twenty eight naks.atras. The difference of one naks.atra appears to represent two traditions trying to reconcile observation to theory in different ways. Many other constellations are also mentioned which makes clear that the Vedic people were much concerned with astronomical phenomena. There is early reference to a six-day week that is called the s.ad. aha1 and to a seven-day week. The Taittir¯ıya Sam. hit¯a speaks of six seasons related to the months as follows: Vasanta (Spring) : Madhu (Caitra), M¯adhava (Vai´s¯akha) Gr¯ıs.ma (Summer) : Sukra (Jyais ´ . t.ha), Suci ( ´ As ¯ .¯ad. ha) Vars.¯a (Rains) : Nabha (Sr¯avan ´. a), Nabhasya (Bh¯adrapada)Sarada (Fall) : Is ´.a (A´svina), ¯ Urja (K¯arttika) ¯Hemanta (Winter) : Saha (M¯arga´sira), Sahasya (Paus.ya)Si´sira (Cold) : Tapa (M¯agha), Tapasya (Ph¯alguna) ´
Sometimes hemanta and ´si´sira were taken together and there is
mention of five seasons. The division into five seasons appears to
have been prompted by the symmetry with the five-year yuga.
Hitherto historians of science have seen the Ved¯a˙nga Jyotis.a of
Lagadha as summarising Vedic astronomical knowledge. This is
a very late book which is not a treatise on astronomy but rather
served as a manual for the determination of the times for rituals.
Based on this text it is not possible to say what else the
Vedic Indian might have known of astronomy. The dating of the
Ved¯a˙nga Jyotis.a has been assumed based on the statement2
that
in Lagadha’s time the winter solstice was at the beginning of the
naks.atra Sravis ´
.
t.h¯a (Delphini) and that the summer solstice was at
the mid-point of the A´sles ¯
.¯a naks.atra. This implies c. 1300 BCE.
Siddh¯antas
Apart from the Ved¯a˙nga Jyotis.a are the more complete manuals of
astronomy called the Siddh¯antas. Some of the early Siddh¯antas are
summarized in Var¯ahamihira’s Pa˜ncasiddh¯antik¯a. How far back
the Siddh¯antas go in time is unknown. But if the Pait¯amaha
Siddh¯anta is named after Bh¯ıs.ma Pit¯amaha of the Bh¯arata War,
as has sometimes been suggested, then the Siddh¯antas represent
a tradition of astronomy, broader than the Ved¯a˙nga Jyotis.a, that
goes back to the close of the R. gvedic age.
Support for this view comes from Var¯ahamihira’s own ranking
of the five Siddh¯antas. Of Pait¯amaha, V¯asis.
t.ha, Romaka, Pauli´sa
and Saura he considers the S¯urya Siddh¯anta to be the best, followed
next by the Pauli´sa and the Romaka as being almost equally
correct, and declaring the remaining two to be much inferior. It
stands to reason that accuracy of these works is related to the recency
of the observations and Pait¯amaha and V¯asis.
t.ha must have
been old Siddh¯antas. It is also likely that the old Siddh¯antas were,
like the Pur¯an. as, revised during the course of centuries. Nevertheless,
it is significant that there is a lot of correspondence in the
methods of the Pait¯amaha Siddh¯anta and the Ved¯a˙nga Jyotis.a.
Once we recognize the beginnings of astronomy in the R. gveda
itself, it becomes possible to understand the evolution of this science to the later Siddh¯antic astronomy.
There are a large number of astronomical references in the Vedic texts. The Satapatha Br¯ahman ´ . a gives the names of twenty seven naks.atras and an equal number of upa-naks.atras. On the other hand, the Taittir¯ıya, the Atharva, the K¯at.haka and the Maitr¯ayan.¯ı Sam. hit¯as give the names of twenty eight naks.atras. The difference of one naks.atra appears to represent two traditions trying to reconcile observation to theory in different ways. Many other constellations are also mentioned which makes clear that the Vedic people were much concerned with astronomical phenomena. There is early reference to a six-day week that is called the s.ad. aha1 and to a seven-day week. The Taittir¯ıya Sam. hit¯a speaks of six seasons related to the months as follows: Vasanta (Spring) : Madhu (Caitra), M¯adhava (Vai´s¯akha) Gr¯ıs.ma (Summer) : Sukra (Jyais ´ . t.ha), Suci ( ´ As ¯ .¯ad. ha) Vars.¯a (Rains) : Nabha (Sr¯avan ´. a), Nabhasya (Bh¯adrapada)Sarada (Fall) : Is ´.a (A´svina), ¯ Urja (K¯arttika) ¯Hemanta (Winter) : Saha (M¯arga´sira), Sahasya (Paus.ya)Si´sira (Cold) : Tapa (M¯agha), Tapasya (Ph¯alguna) ´
Sometimes hemanta and ´si´sira were taken together and there is
mention of five seasons. The division into five seasons appears to
have been prompted by the symmetry with the five-year yuga.
Hitherto historians of science have seen the Ved¯a˙nga Jyotis.a of
Lagadha as summarising Vedic astronomical knowledge. This is
a very late book which is not a treatise on astronomy but rather
served as a manual for the determination of the times for rituals.
Based on this text it is not possible to say what else the
Vedic Indian might have known of astronomy. The dating of the
Ved¯a˙nga Jyotis.a has been assumed based on the statement2
that
in Lagadha’s time the winter solstice was at the beginning of the
naks.atra Sravis ´
.
t.h¯a (Delphini) and that the summer solstice was at
the mid-point of the A´sles ¯
.¯a naks.atra. This implies c. 1300 BCE.
Siddh¯antas
Apart from the Ved¯a˙nga Jyotis.a are the more complete manuals of
astronomy called the Siddh¯antas. Some of the early Siddh¯antas are
summarized in Var¯ahamihira’s Pa˜ncasiddh¯antik¯a. How far back
the Siddh¯antas go in time is unknown. But if the Pait¯amaha
Siddh¯anta is named after Bh¯ıs.ma Pit¯amaha of the Bh¯arata War,
as has sometimes been suggested, then the Siddh¯antas represent
a tradition of astronomy, broader than the Ved¯a˙nga Jyotis.a, that
goes back to the close of the R. gvedic age.
Support for this view comes from Var¯ahamihira’s own ranking
of the five Siddh¯antas. Of Pait¯amaha, V¯asis.
t.ha, Romaka, Pauli´sa
and Saura he considers the S¯urya Siddh¯anta to be the best, followed
next by the Pauli´sa and the Romaka as being almost equally
correct, and declaring the remaining two to be much inferior. It
stands to reason that accuracy of these works is related to the recency
of the observations and Pait¯amaha and V¯asis.
t.ha must have
been old Siddh¯antas. It is also likely that the old Siddh¯antas were,
like the Pur¯an. as, revised during the course of centuries. Nevertheless,
it is significant that there is a lot of correspondence in the
methods of the Pait¯amaha Siddh¯anta and the Ved¯a˙nga Jyotis.a.
Once we recognize the beginnings of astronomy in the R. gveda
itself, it becomes possible to understand the evolution of this science to the later Siddh¯antic astronomy.