Thursday, September 10, 2020

galant women

 Muthulakshmi Reddy was born in 1886 in the princely state of Pudukottai in Tamilnadu. Her father was Narayanswami Iyer. Her mother was a devadasi. In Tamil, they were called “Devaradiyar”.If you are an Indian, I don’t need to tell what that means. In case you didn’t know, they were women who were ostensibly “dedicated” to temple deities tasked with passing on the baton of the art of dance to the next generation. The grim reality was different. They were often subjected to exploitation and were considered prostitutes by the British government. It was actually  worse than prostitution- no one chose to be a devadasi. The prepubescent girl was initiated into the system by a religious ceremony which ensured her permanent status as a concubine. She would have a male patron, but no rights to his surname or inheritance. Devadasis needn’t marry and were called, “Nityasumangali” - meaning immune to widowhood. It was a crass euphemism - after all, you can’t become a widow if you aren’t married.


Luckily for Muthulakshmi, her father was an academician and a school principal. A sole oasis in an otherwise barren desert. He gave her the power of education. The class in which she studied had 40 boys and 3 girls - separated by a screen. Even then the parents of the boys objected, fearing their “innocent” sons would be ensnared by a prepubescent femme fatale.This may sound absurd, but this was a common trope in those days.One of the teachers resigned in protest. But her father stood with her and provided her a plank. After attaining puberty, she was home schooled, as was the tradition in those days. She wanted to change not just her destiny, but also those of others. She asked the Maharaja of Pudukottai for funds to study medicine.The stunned Maharaja gave her a princely sum of Rs.150 which was the much needed escape velocity that changed her trajectory.

She became the first woman to enter Madras medical college. She was studious and bagged several medals. When she wanted to take obstetrics and become a surgeon, the professors were shocked. Surgery with its blood and gore, was considered a man thing then. Nevertheless, with characteristic persistence, she became an obstetrician. She started catering to the elite professionals first. However, a turning point happened soon.

Her sister developed rectal cancer and eventually died. Back then, cancer wasn’t known to the public as the emperor of maladies. Those who were unlucky enough to get it were considered doomed. No one wanted to spend on a lost cause. So Dr Muthulakshmi took it upon herself to go to the UK and trained in Royal Marsden hospital to manage cancer patients. She had a rare combination of strong roots and powerful wings. She came back to Madras, but faced painful apathy about cancer.

She turned to Women’s India Association - which helped fund, the first cancer hospital in Madras - the Adyar cancer institute. One day, three girls from Namakkal ran away from the Devadasi system and asked her , “Now what will happen of us? Where will we stay?”. She realized the dire problem and set about the long journey that would culminate in their emancipation.
She sheltered them, but not just them. She started the Avvai home. She met Sarojini Naidu and became a nationalist. Realizing the importance of political power, she went on to become the first woman to join the legislative council in British India. She was also the first woman in the world, to become the deputy President of a legislative council.

She met and married Sundara Reddy, with the condition that they will be equals. Dr Muthulakshmi Reddy, faced two simulataneous battles - finding land and funding for the cancer hospital. Liberation of the devadasis. For the latter, she had to fight against the likes of Dr Rajagopalachari. In a meeting when a speaker expressed solidarity with her “fallen sisters”, she famously thundered, “How dare you call them fallen sisters? Female chastity is impossible without male chastity. The men who exploited them were older and should be held responsible”. She knew they weren’t “fallen”, but “pushed”.

To Rajagopalachari and S Satyamurthi, she roared,”If you need someone to preserve the arts and culture, why don’t you leave the devadasis and send the women in your home?”. The stiff resistance would have wilted a lesser woman, but she was forged in fire. Her efforts bore fruit in both the issues.

The cancer hospital, grew slowly but steadily. She asked everyone who would listen for funds, including King George V.Today it’s a world class institute, giving life to many. Her statue stands there, like a guardian angel of the cancer patients. On December 5,1947, at long last, the Madras Presidency passed the bill preventing the dedication of young girls as devadasis.

The laurels followed. She was awarded Padma Bhushan by the Indian government. Tamilnadu government has named the pregnancy benefits scheme after a her. There is a road in Chennai named after her.

Her story is the triumph of grit over fate. It’s a reminder that we can script our own destiny, regardless of where we start. Neither social ostracism, nor the strictures of colonial India could conquer her will. She turned life’s proverbial lemons into a lemonade spring, that continues to give even today.

She’s the hero, that our daughters need to know about. Perhaps we should tell her story, instead of Cinderella’s.

Wednesday, September 9, 2020

V A

 

Varahi Ashtakam Lyrics

Goddess Varahi Ashtakam Lyrics or Varahi Anugrahashtakam Lyrics free download. Goddess Varahi is the consort of Varaha Avatar of Lord Vishnu. Also known as Barahi, Varahi Devi is one of the Sapta Matrukas, a group of Seven Mother Goddesses in the Hindu religion. Varahi Ashtakam is chanted to destroy all sorrows and also to defeat your enemies. 

Varahi Ashtakam Lyrics in English

Matha Jagatdrachana Natake Suthra Dhara
Sadroopamakalyithum Paramarthatho Yam
Eesopyameeswara Padam Sampaithi Thadhruk
Konyasthavam Kimiva Thavaka Madha Dathu

Namani Kinthu Granatha Sthava Loka Thunde
Nadambaram Sprusathi Danda Dharasya Dhanda
Thallesa Langitha Bhavambu Nidheeya Thoyam
Thannama Samsmrutheriyam Na Puna Sthuthisthe

Twachinda Nadarasamulla Sada Prameya
Nandhodayath Samuditha Sphuta Roma Harsha
Mathar Namami Sudithani Sadhetyamum Thwa
Mabhyarthayerthamithi Poorayathadhayalo

Indrendu Mouli Vidhi Kesava Mouli Rathna
Rochischayojjwallitha Pada Saroja Yugme
Chethonathou Mama Sada Prathibimbitha Thwam
Bhooya Bhavani Bhava Nasini Bhavaye Thwaam

Lelodrutha Kshithi Thalasya Varahamoorther
Varaha Moorthirakhilartha Kari Thwameva
Praaleya Rasmisukalollasithavathamsa
Thwam Devi Vamathanu Bhagahara Harasya

Thamambha Thaptha Kanakojjwala Kanthi Mantha
Aarye Chinthayanthi Yuvathi Thanu Magaalaantham
Chakrayudhm Trinayanam Vara Pathri Vakthram
Thesham Padambhuja Yugam Pramanthi Deva

Thwath Sevana Skhalitha Papachayasya Matha
Mokshopi Yasya Na Satho Gananam Upaithi
Devasuroraga Nrupoojitha Pada Peeta
Kasya Sriya Sa Khalu Bhajanatham Ne Dathe

Kim Dushkaram Thwayi Mano Vishayam Gathayam
Kim Durlabham Thwayi Vidhanu Vadarchithayam
Kim Durbharam Thwayi Sakruth Smruthi Magathayam
Kim Durjayam Thwayi Krutha Sthuthi Vada Pumsam

jitante stotra

 most temples play this stotras regularly


Introduction :- Jitante stotram is a Rigveda khilam meaning an infrequented portion. Just as Purushasuktam which propounds the tenets, exists in all Sruthis, so all so, this Jitante is proclaimed in the scripture and itihAsa purAnAs as a mahamantram and classified as confidential on par with tirumantram. This Jitante, being a portion of the Apourusheya vedas, it may be questioned as to how it exists in the other man-made works like ItihAsa and PurAnas. The answer is :- Khilam is a highly infrequented portion. The Sutrakaras have studied vedas with khilam portions. They have mentioned and included Jitante as a mantram in ItihAsa PurAnas as evidenced by the quotation " Jitanta iti mantreNa " .

The residents of SwetadwIpa, who have yielded their hearts to the virtues of KshIrAbdhi nAtha like His beauty and handsomeness, sing this Jitante hymn. It is graded as a stotram as it is dearest to the lord, who is fond of praises (stavapriya). This stotram appears in a place hard to access even to BrahmA and others. How possibly could it then find a place in ItihAsa and PurAnas and become accessible to humans? Here is how :- When Narada bhagavan was on his way to Sweta DwIpa to visit and worship KshIrAbdhi NAthan, who is the God revealed by this mantram, he saw sages Ekata Dvita and Trita doing penance. Narada thought, "how can I hope to see the object which even these sages are unable to approach" and returned and asked them "What is then appropriate for me to do?". They replied, "In this place, the stotram, with which, the residents of Sweta dwIpa, praise KshIrAbdhi NAthan has been obtained and learnt by us by virtue of our long penances. You may learn it from us and recite it every day". Narada learnt this Jitante from them and was on his way , when on a mountain called Jayantha, one Kutumbi (sic) , who came to know from Narada of the episode of the birth of this stotram from BrahmA, insisted on learning it and accepted it from Narada. From then on, it was written (by Kutumbi) in ItihaAsa and PurAnas and became available to all devotees of the God.

When we contemplate on the inner meaning of this stotram it appears like the commentary on prapatti. Sri Parasara Bhattar has said of this, in a muktaka (free) slokam,

avidyAto deve paribhridhatayA va viditayA
sva bhakter bhUmnA va jagati gatimanyAm aviduShAm
gatir gamyashchAsow haririti jitantAhvaya mano:
rahasyam vyAjahre sa khalu bhagavAn Shaunaka muni:

meaning that the eligible candidates for prapatti are ajnas, sarvajnas and bhakti paravashars. ajna is one who does not have jnana and shakti for attaining God; sarvajna is one who knows that God can not be measured in terms of space, time, and other mundane objects and thus does not put any effort to attain God, knowing that God is unattainable by any other means; bhakti paravashan is one who although having the necessary jnana nd shakti is unable to follow the prescribed rules for attaining God due to addiction to bhakti. These three types of persons know of no other means except God. For them the target and means of reaching it are both, the Lord Himself. This is the actual secret meaning, of the mantram called Jitante, which was expounded by that omniscient sage bhagavan Saunaka.

Atma is an asset and God is its owner. One who is solely the servant of the Lord alone can be the adhikari for dvayam. This swami-dasa relationship exists since time sans a beginning. Not realising this due to a long connection with Nature, and due to Ahankara and Mamakara, the Atma usurps the Lord's qualities of swamitva and swatantrya and becomes a robber of the soul (Atmaapahaari). The lord seeing the Atmas which are under opposition to Him as exemplified by Hiranyakasipu saying "paramesvara samjno ajna kimanyo mayyavasthite" and Ravana saying " dvidhaa bhajyeyam apyevam na nameyam tu kasyachit", thought that these Atmas can not be redeemed with the help of Shaastras; they are addicts to sense objects; so let me attract them using their own addiction by showing My beauty and other gunas. He first generated their taste for beauty and once attracted by beauty He became their means of reaching Himself and once they stuck to Him as the Upaaya, He became their prapya. These aspects are dealt with in this prabandham of Jitante.

Thus, the first slokam briefly states the target and the mode of reaching it. The further slokams elaborate on this aspect as opined by Sri Parasara Bhattar in his nirvaham.

Alternately, the first two slokas describe the prapya and prapaka and the further slokams justify the above by describing the Sharanyatva of the Lord according to TiruNaraiyur Araiyar's nirvaham. When it is appropriate to state first, the Sharanyatva and then describe the prapya and prapaka, why is it done in the reverse here? Araiyar opined that this is done in the analogy of the first occurrence of God's union in "tiruvaaNai ninnaaNai " and then followed by separation as "peraavaaNai" in muniye nAnmukane decade.

Jitante pundarIkAkSha namsthE vishvabhAvana
namasthE stu hriShIkEsha mahApuruSha pUrvaja

pundarIkAkSha - oh lotus eyed, this object called soul has been conquered by you
nama: - this is not mine
tE - This is yours
vishvabhAvana - oh creator of all the universe
HriShIkEsha - controller of senses
mahApuruSha - oh greatest among the givers, munificent
pUrvaja - born prior to all
namstEstu - this soul should be divested of my ownership and should become your rightful possession.

This sloka tells how the Lord conquers the straying person by displaying His beauty and makes him pray to Him as the decided goal.

The straying person has taken a vow as it were of deviating and diverging from God (cf. yAdAnum paRRi nIngum viratam) and indulging in other sense objects. The Lord on the other hand, chases the person as it were, severs his interest in the sense objects, inculcates svarUpa jnAna in him, and pledges not to return without the gaining ownership of the person. Whenever he strays to other objects of interest, He displays His beauty and conquers him (cf. irundAn kandukondu). Being pleased with the person's defeat, He asks "who is defeated?" ; then the person replies (cf. tORROm mada nenjam emberumAn nAraNarku) that "victory is Yours. Is there something that You cannot conquer by the brahmAstra of Your lotus like eyes. (pundarIkAkShatva)". After all it is only by way of the eyes that living beings can impress influence and enslave each other. So here it says that You are conquering us with the help of lotus-eyes. (cf. iNaik koottham kolO ariyEn)

A self-willed person can be brought around by shAstras but to bring around a viShaya pravaNa, (one who indulges in sense objects), is there any other implement better than beauty.

namastE - Now who conquered whom and whose property? I have stolen the Atma belonging to You. You conquered me and took back Your property. (cf. aham api na mama bhagavata Eva aham asmi). The word - nama: - denotes surrendering. namastestu -- kindly prevent the usurpation of the soul by me and appropriate it for Yourself. When God is helping me by creating my interest in Him for His benefit, why should I, a chetana rush and solicit for His slavery (kainkaryam) ? The moment He created interest for a chetana in Him and enlightened him with svarUpa jnAna, the next spontaneous thing for the chetana is to wake up and solicit for His kainkaryam, in line with what is appropriate for his svarUpa.

When the hunchback dwarf (kubjA) woman's hunch was removed by Lord krishna, she requested krishna to come to her house for enjoyment. (cf. vastrE pragrihya govinda , mama gEham vrajEti vy). Likewise, here too God removes a hunch of the Atma - chetana, in the form of ahankAra and mamakAra by displaying His beautiful eyes. When the svatantrya of the chetana is removed and pAratantrya shines through, he becomes fit for the spirit and taste of kainkaryam.

Similarly, the Lord impressed the florist, mAlAkArar, by His beauty, made him fall at His feet several times and made him offer all the garlands and accepted his services (cf. puna: puna: praNamyAha mAlAkArO ativismita:).

vishva bhAvana -- creator of the universe. For a Person who could create this woe-begone universe from nothing, can He not infuse goodness in me who am existing? Is it a difficult task for Him? After all, what is His objective in creation -- to pick out atleast a few mumukShus after the refinement of chetanas. Obtaining mumukshus is for His pleasure. hriShIkEsha -- At the beginning of creation, there was no diversion for the souls to stray from God. Now there are the incorrigible sense organs and the objects for indulgence, to drag the souls away from God. Hence You can control the senses and help me by reining my senses. "Yo vAchi tiShThan , yashchakShuShi tiShThan " etc. I, the chetana, is ever since creation, submissive to the sense organs.

Even if one is omnipotent why will anyone do what all he can? - because You are MahApurusha -- You are omnipotent, but do You use Your potency? yes, You are the greatest of all liberal, munificent persons. You gift the desires of Your bhaktas so profusely that they do not have to beg You again. You and Your assets are all spread out for the benefit of Your devotees. (cf. sa sarvAn arthinO drishTvA samEtya pratinandya cha). This munificence is explained in practice, next. pUrvaja -- in creation, in incarnation and in being upAya, You are at the head of all gains and losses. In every event, the gains, fruits and losses are primarily Yours. Just as in 'bahusyam prajAyEya' the benefit and pride of descending through many bodies, is His own, so also, in 'EkAkI na ramEta', the displeasure of loneliness is also His own. Even in incarnation, as in 'sambhavAmi Atma mAyayA' the incarnation is by His free will for the sake of steering a few good souls towards Himself. If one asks that He took birth owing to the pleas of devas, as in 'sa hi devair arthito jajne' ; the answer is no; it was an excuse; but protection of saadhus was His main benefit; as in ' paritrANAya sadhUnAm'. This is just as in the case of Arjuna; in the guise of encouraging him to wage war, Krishna discoursed on the yoga of bhakti towards Himself. As in 'upAyopEyatve tadiha tava tatvam', just as the virtue of upEyatva is eternal to Him, so also the virtue of upAyatva. His upAyatva does not surface merely when a chetana accepts Him. Sri Parasara Bhattar said in SriRangarajastavam --

"Upanishat declares that SrimanNarayaNa, appropriates for Himself for His own benefit, all the chits and achits by the processes of creation, control and protection. So UpAyatva and UpEyatva are His Svarupa and not mere qualities. Therefore, You who sleeps in Srirangam, I do take refuge in You without any pretext and subterfuge ".

Even during the time of bhoga or enjoyment, He, to show His precedence over the gopis in five lakh houses, keeps the flute over His mouth and plays it. And for a chetana who develops a keen desire to sustain this bhoga, uninterruptedly, He shows him the way so that he may not have to search for Him and awaits his arrival at the Vaikuntham along with His consort Shree. (ShriyA sArdham jagatpati: AsthE Vishnur achinthyAtmA bhaktair bhAgavathais saha).

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

P T T Unique.

It was originally built by the Pallavas in the 8th century by king Narasimhavarman I. The temple has icons of five forms of Vishnu: NarasimhaRamaGajendra VaradarajaRanganatha and Krishna. The temple is one of the oldest structures in Chennai. There are shrines for Vedavalli Thayar, Ranganatha, Rama, Gajendra Varadaraja, Narasimha, AndalHanuman, Alvars, Ramanuja, Swami Manavala Mamunigal and Vedanthachariar. The temple subscribes to Vaikhanasa agama and follows Thenkalai tradition. There are separate entrances for the Krishna and Narasimha temples. The gopuram (towers) and mandapas (pillars) are decorated with elaborate carvings, a standard feature of South Indian Temple Architecture.

As per Hindu legend, Saptarishis, the seven sages worshipped five deities Panchaveeras, namely, Venkata Krishnaswamy, Rukmini, Satyaki, Balarama, Pradyumna and Aniruddha. As per Mahabharatha, Vishnu, in his avatar as Krishna was acting as charioteer for Arjuna, the Pandava prince during the war with Kauravas. Krishna did not take any weapons during the war. During the fight between Arjuna and Bhishma, Krishna was injured by the arrow from Bhishma. The mark in the image in the temple is believed to follow the legend. The place is called Allikeni, meaning a pond of lily as it is believed that historically the place was full of lily ponds. The place is the only place where the presiding deity is sported with a mustache. As per another legend, the place was once a Tulsi forest. A king named Sumati wanted to see Vishnu in the form of Parthasarathi and prayed at Srinivasa temple in Tirupathi. Srinivasa directed the king to visit the temple here built by sage Atreya and worshipped with another sage called Sumati.



 The Parthasarathy Swamy Temple is one of the 108 Divya Desams, is said to have been renovated by a King of Pallava dynasty. "Brindaranya" is the traditional Puranic name of Thiru-Alli-Keni now known as Thiruvallikeni or modern Triplicane. It is said that for at least five thousand years, it has been a resting place for pilgrims who had come down from Thirupathy to have a bath in the sea on the days of Solar and Lunar Eclipses and on other auspicious days it being in a direct line to Thirupathy, Thiruthani and Trivellore and the route being free from swamps.

    According to Brahmanda Puranam, the five Deities in the temple are said to have been worshipped by the Saptah Rishis viz. Bhrigu, Manchi, Atri, Markandeya, Sumathi, Saptharoma and Jabali and also have been praised by two of the earliest Alwars viz. Thirumazhisai Alwar, Peyalwar and later on by Thirumangai mannan or Kaliyan, who is considered to be the last of the Alwars chronologically and his year of birth would appear to be 476 A.D. according to the era of Salivahana Saka.

    The presiding Deity of this temple Sri Venkatakrishna Swami also known as "GEETHACHARYA". According to Brahmanda purana, King Sumathy prayed Lord Thiruvengada of the Seven Hills to give him darshan in the form of the Charioteer (SARATHY) to PARTHA during the MAHABHARATHA WAR and rendering GEETHA. Lord Thiruvengada appeared in his dream and bade him to go to "BRINDARANYA" where he would give him Darshan in the form he wished. Meanwhile, Athreya Maharishi requested his Acharya Vedavyasa to mention to him the place fit for doing Thapas and he was directed by his Acharya to go to Brindaranya on the banks of the Kairavani Theertham overgrown with Thulasi plants and where king Sumathy was doing Thapas. Saying so, Vedavyasa gave Athreya a Divya-Mangala Vigraha with a conch in his right hand and Gnana Mudra in the left hand pointing to HIS HOLY FEET signifying the famous Charama Sloka of the Bhagavat Geetha:-

    "Sarva Dharman Parithyajya Mamekam Saranam Vraja Ahamthwa Sarwa Papebhyo Mokshayishyami Ma Suchaha" (18-66):

    This quintessence of the Geetha is rendered into English by Sir Edwin Amold thus:-
"And let go those Rites and writ duties! Fly to Me alone!
Make Me thy single refuge! I will free Thy soul from all its sins! Be of good cheer!"

    Accordingly, Athreya Maharishi reached the Ashramam of Sumathy and narrated to him in detail, the circumstances that led him to go there. Sumathy was pleased with the Divya Mangala image of Sri Parthasarathy Swamy in accordance with the desire and welcomed Athreya. He celebrated the Chaitrotsavam according to Vaikanasa Agama and worshipped him. The central figure enshrined in the sanctum sanctorum is being worsipped as "SRI VENKATAKRISHNA SWAMY". Sri Rukmani Thayar and Satyaki, his younger brother, are installed on his right and left side respectively. His elder brother Balarama is seen on the right side of Rukmani Thayar facing north and his son Prathyumnan and his grandson Anirudhan are seen on the northern side of the Garbagraha facing south. These five warriors (Pancha Veeral) are so placed in these positions as we now worship them to keep in conformity with some incidents that took place in their life-time. Still more grandeur and inspiring is the bewitching and ever smiling UTHSAVAR Deity – Sri Parthasarathy Swami, with marks in the face caused by Bheeshma's arrows during the Maha Bharatha War. The Thilagam set with diamonds with a Safire in the centre resembles the full moon in the crystal clear blue sky.


The temple had internal conflict from the 1750s till the end of the century between the two subsects of Vaishnavism, namely Thenkalai and Vadagalai] The two sects were grounded over the right of reciting each of their own version of concluding verses in the temple. A petition was received by the ruling British government to decide the religious dispute. English records mention petition during the year 1754 filed by local inhabitants and merchants seeking to resolve the dispute. They suggested that the Tenkalai Brahmins could recite their Srisailesadayaptram in the Parthasarathi shrine, while the Vadakalai Brahmins could recite their Ramanujadayapatram in the Telinga Singar shrine. The council agreed that the suggestion in the petition be accepted and publicly announced. There were further petitions in 1780 from the Tenkalai Brahmins that since the temple was built, recitals were made only in Srisailesadayaptram, which should continue. It also asserted that the trustee Manali Muthukrishna Mudali favoured Vadakalai resulting in the issue. While both the sects were claiming theirs should be the practice followed in the temple, the English administrators in India has deep rooted belief that old ways were the only solution to preserve tranquility. The Tenkalai sect had the sanction of antiquity and custom resulting in Tenkalai gaining precedence.

The bearers at the temple were traditionally fishermen of Triplicane. During the temple festivities, they carry the festival idol in their sturdy shoulders in an atmosphere of wine and toddy shops.[28] They bargained for additional rights in the temple in 1928, which eventually ended their ties with the temple.[28]

Bharathiar, the legendary Tamil poet and independence activist was struck by an elephant at the temple, whom he used to feed regularly. Although he survived the incident, a few months later his health deteriorated and he died.

Swami Vivekananda, an Indian Hindu Monk is a devotee of Parthasarathy. In one of his letters in the year 1893 to his disciple Alasinga, he writes 'Take a bow before Lord Parthasarathy of Thiruvallikeni and give an undertaking before Him of a great sacrifice, one of a whole life for the poor, the lowly and the oppressed - for whom Lord Parthasarathy comes from time to time and whom he loves above all.' You can find this letter to his disciple inscribed in one of the walls at temple corridor

rare facts.

There is a mark on the utsava moorthy face that is said to be that from the strike received from Bhishma’s arrows intended for Arjuna.

Sannadhis

Venkatakrishna
Vedavalli thayaar
Rama with Sita, Lakshmana, Bharat, Shatrugan and Hanuman
Ranganathar
Gajendra Varadhan
Narasimhar
Aandal
Garuda
Vinayagar
Alavandar
Thirukacchi Nambi
Vedanta Desikar
Ramanujar
Manavala mamunigal
Anjaneya
Keseva
Madhava
Anandan
Thirumazhisai alwar
Embar
Nathamuni
Poigai alwar
Bhootatalwar
Pattarbhiran
Thirupan
Thondarpadi
Madhurakavi
Nathamuni
Kaliyan
Vishwaksenar


The Parthasarathy Swamy temple in Tiruvallikeni is the only Divya Desam among the 108 strictly within Chennai city limits. The other two Divya Desams close to Chennai are the Nityakalyana Perumal temple in Thiruvidanthai and the Ranganatha Swami temple in Thiruneermalai (both in Kanchipuram District).

The Azhwars have sung Tamil verses (Pasurams) about all the deities enshrined in this temple namely Narasimha, Parthasarathy, Gajendra Varada, Ranganatha and Rama. This is rare as usually only the main deity is praised.

The standing, seated and reclining poses of Vishnu are seen in this temple.

There are two dwajastambham in this temple - one on the East in front of the Venkatakrishnan sanctum and the other on the West in front of the Narasimha sanctum.

The main image of Venkatakrishnan is usually seen with a big white moustache. On only the four days preceding Vaikunta Ekadasi in the month of Margazhi, can the deity be seen without the moustache. On these four days, Venkatakrishnan wears simple attire.

The image of Venkatakrishnan is two armed, holding the Shankha or conch in the right hand and the left hand in varada hasta (boon-conferring pose). It is noteworthy that the deity does not hold the Chakra or discus.

Goddess Vedavalli Thayar’s processions are only inside the temple and this deity never comes out of the temple premises.

In the Ranganatha sanctum, there is an image of Varaha near the head of Ranganatha and Narasimha near the feet.

The main image of Gajendra Varadar is seen riding on Garuda. This is indeed unique.

Three separate Kalyana Utsavams are celebrated here - two for Ranganatha and Vedavalli Thayar and one for Parthasarathy and Andal. In addition, on Adi Puram day, Andal is seen with Parthasarathy.

The bells in the sanctum for Yoga Narasimha do not have tongues as this would disturb the Yogic state of the deity.

One of the most ancient inscriptions discovered in the city of Chennai is in the Parthasarathy Swamy temple. It belongs to the reign of the Pallava king Dantivarman of the 9th century A.D.

Swami Vivekananda's letter to Azhagiya Singar of Thiruvallikeni dated 1893 has been inscribed near the Narasimha shrine. In it he praises Parthasarathi Swami.

rich man story.

 In old Babylon, there once lived a very rich man named Arkad.Far and wide he was famed for his great wealth.

Also he was famed for his liberality. He was generous in his charities. He was generous with his family. He was liberal in his own expenses.

But nevertheless each year his wealth increased more rapidly than he spent it.

If there is one book that many people have heard about but not many people have read, it’s The Richest Man In Babylon by George S. Clason.

Babylon was once the most successful and richest kingdom on planet earth, there were rich homes, palaces, and giant stone walls.

But this city also known for something else: Being the birthplace of modern finance.

They used money to exchange goods, they traded property, and had highly developed forms of borrowing and lending.

Everyone in the land was allowed to make money freely like we do today, even slaves were allowed to have a side gig and eventually buy their freedom.

This ancient city inspired George S. Clason to write finance and wealth fables that took place in Babylonia, the stories were very popular at the time and were even handed out by banks and insurance companies to teach people about why they should save their money and work hard.

They would later be collected into a book called The Richest Man In Babylon.

The first story in the book is about two friends, a chariot builder and a musician, talking about how they are having trouble making ends meet and wanting more for themselves and their families.

After wondering if there could be another way, they begin to talk about a man they grew up with named Arkad who was now considered the richest man in babylon.

They decide to go see their old friend and ask for his advice.

They asked him how fate has come to make him rich, but he immediately gets mad and says “fate” had nothing to do with it.

Arkad lets them know that they have only remained poor because they failed to learn the laws that govern the building of wealth.

As a young boy Arkad noticed that even if money didn’t create happiness, it certainly raised the quality of life for people that had it.

With wealth you could have nice furnishings, quality clothing, travel, and eat expensive food. He decided he wasn’t going to live as a poor man and would make himself “a guest at the banquet of good things.”

Although he didn’t come from a rich family and therefore had no inheritance, he put himself in a position to study the ways of wealth.

His first job was as a scribe, he worked long and hard writing laws and other things on clay tablets.

After working on a particularly hard overnight job for a money lender, Arkad asked the client if he could teach him some of the secrets of money.

Paying Yourself First

 

The man agreed and in morning he shared one principle: “A part of what you earn must be yours to keep.”

Arkad thought he had been swindled, “Wasn’t all of what you earned yours to keep?”

Living expenses quickly eat up what you’ve earned, which means that you become a slave to your work and earn merely to survive,” the money lender observed.

What he was getting at is that if you set aside 10% of your earnings, and mark it off as “not for expenditure,” over time this amount builds and starts making money for you.

And it doesn’t even matter how much money you start with, as long as you obey the rule of paying yourself first.

Soon you won’t even notice this small amount is gone.

Arkad eventually grew his savings to a pleasing amount, and this satisfied the money lender who even asked Arkad to run some of his big estate (even sharing the profits).

Those who know the laws of money seek one another out, while many say they know all about the laws of money, the principles don’t work for them because they don’t put them into action.

Don’t mistake the money lender’s advice as permission to be a cheapskate, he tells Arkad to enjoy his life and not to stress over the amount he’s saving as long as he keeps the nest egg growing.

 

The Choice Between Gold Or Wisdom

 

Eventually Arkad has a son named Nomasir (No-Mah-Seer) who is all grown up and ready to inherit his dad’s large fortune.

But Arkad wants Nomasir to first go out into the world and learn how to make money on his own.

Arkad gives Nomasir three bags of gold as a head start and a tablet with “the five laws of gold” etched into them.

Nomasir ignores the tablet and spends a large amount of the gold on horse bets (which he loses) and then he opens a shop with someone who has no idea how to run a shop (it closes down).

But as his situation gets desperate, he recalls the five laws on the clay tablet:

1.     Money comes to those who save

2.     Money multiplies for those who invest it

3.     Money stays with the person who entrusts it to wise people

4.     Money is lost when invested in things with which you are not familiar

5.     Money is lost at a fast rate by pursuing get-rich quick schemes

After seeing that he basically violated every law, Nomasir decides to learn them by heart. He earns money patiently and invests it wisely.

He returns to his father Arkad after 10 years, who throws a feast in his son’s honor.

Nomasir lays three large bags of gold on the table, one for the amount money his dad gave him, and another two for the wisdom on the tablets. He says to the people at the party:

“Without wisdom, gold is quickly lost by those who have it, but with wisdom, gold can be secured by those who have it not.”

You can look at lottery winners for an example of people who gain money in a short amount of time and lose it just as quickly.

The five laws help build a large amount of wealth, and also to keep you from losing it.

Live Within Your Means

 

Paying yourself first is such and important principle to have especially in our economy of high debt, at the same time you should pay off any debt you accumulate.

Save 10% for yourself, Pay 20% to your debtors and live off the rest. Many of us don’t save because we are constantly thinking about our enormous debts, but once you see the enormous pile of cash you’re growing then you will be motivated to save more and more.

“Touch not one tenth that is fattening the purse.”

Interestingly, the book changes it’s setting to the modern day where an archaeologist discovers the tablets and sends them to a professor for translation.

The professor and his wife apply the 2,000 year old knowledge to their lives and change their financial situation drastically.

“Who would believe there could be such a difference in results between following a financial plan and just drifting along?” said the professor.

The richest man in babylon got that way by living within his means, anyone can get rich by living on 80 percent of their income and saving/investing the rest.

 

In Conclusion

The richest man in babylon won’t win any awards for it’s writing style but it is a classic for a reason, this book will lay the mental foundation necessary to become rich, it shows you things you won’t learn in school.

Everyone should devote time to learn how to save and invest.

They should learn the value of having a strong work ethic and why you should be someone who makes money work for you instead of the other way around.

Even if you think it might be too late for you, you still have a chance to enjoy the rest of your life.

The seeking of self-improvement will be richly rewarded.


Sunday, September 6, 2020

3 instead of one.

 There are several Schools and traditions of Kalpa Sutras; and are ascribed to various Rishis. Among the Kalpa Sutras, the Asvalayana, Sankhyana and the Sambhavya belong to the Rig-Veda. The Mashaka, Latyayana, Drahyayana, Gobhila and Khadirai belong to the Sama-Veda. The Katyayana and Paraskara belong to the Sukla Yajur-Veda. The Apastamba, Hiranyakeshi, Bodhayana, Bharadvaja, Manava, Vaikhanasa and the Kathaka belong to the Krishna Yajur-Veda. The Vaitana and the Kaushika belong to the Atharva-Veda.


 Sri Ramanuja, who reckons Bodhayana as being the foremost among his Purava-acharya-s (Past Masters of his tradition Viz. Bodhayana, Tanka, Dramida, Guhadeva, Kapardi and Baruchi) does not, anywhere, equate Bodhayana with Upavarsha.

(e) Another reason for not identifying Bodhayana with Upavarsha is the stand taken by their followers on the question of the unity or otherwise of the Mimamsa as a whole.

It is said; Bodhayana laid equal importance of Jnana and Karma Kandas; as   the two together constituted the doctrinal system (Shastraikatva).   He held the view that directly after completing the rituals one should take up the investigation into Brahman, which is the study of Vedanta. His position was coined by the later Vedanta Schools as jnana-karma-samucchaya-vada, the doctrine that synthesizes jnana and karma.  This was also the position taken by Sri Ramanuja in his Sri Bhashya.

Sri Sankara, on the other hand, did not accord much significance to rituals, naturally, tended to differ from Bodhayana.

Bodhayana’s position also meant that Purva and Uttara Mimamsa are two sections of the same text.

But, Sri Sankara’s basic position was that the Mimamsa Sutra which commences with the statement  Atato Dhrama jijnasa is quite separate from the Brahma Sutra commencing with Atato Brahmajijnasa.  Sri Sankara’s Shatra-aramba refers to the beginning of the Brahma sutra; and not to Mimamsa that covered both Purva and UttaraSri Sankara presents his commentary as a sort of Mimamsa by calling it as Vedanta-mimamsa. He does not use the terms Purva Mimamsa or Uttara -Mimamsa. He did not seem to regard Brahma Sutra as a latter part of the same text.

Sri Sankara maintained that the two systems are addressed to different class of persons. Karma-kanda consist injunctions to act in order to achieve certain results. But, liberation is not a product or a thing to be achieved. Jnana-kanda is about Brahman that already exists; it pertains to the ultimate purpose which is true knowledge of Self, and it is addressed to one who is intent on liberation.   Each section of Veda is valid in its own sphere; but, the two sections cannot logically be bound together.

Sri Sankara generally followed the explanations provided by Upavarsha. And, these were not the same as the views attributed to Bodhayana.  Naturally, these led to doctrinal differences between Sri Ramanuja and Sri Sankara.

(e) .Thus, the Advaita School believes that Bodhayana is different from Upavarsha.  That is also quite possible because of the vast time difference between the two. While Upavarsha may belong to about the fourth century BCE, Bodhayana the Vrttikara may have lived in the fifth or the sixth century AD.

It, therefore, seems safe to assume that Upavarsha, Krtakoti and Bodhayana as being three different persons.