Pápa & Puńya
Bali donating to Vamana Murty, while Guru Shukracharya asking Bali not to (Sadashiva temple Nuggehalli, Karnataka, India) (2015)
Paapa (pápa), though widely interpreted as sin, is explained in SanÄtana á¸harma literature as an experience of the JÄĢva as a result of dush:karmÄ, and Punya (puńya) as an experience as a result of sat:karmÄ. These concepts are inherent in Hinduism and Buddhism. This exploration is not to compare, but to delve into its fundamentals. In the form of pápa(m), the JÄĢva experiences dush:karmÄ through some sort of unavailability or suffering, and puńya through some sort of availability or happiness. Puńya(m) and pápa(m) both get exhausted over time. As and when suffering and happiness get exhausted, the JÄĢva tends to accumulate both based on its current actions, which is nothing but karmÄ, making it a never-ending cyclic loop called saášsÄra. So what is KarmÄ and its source? KarmÄ is a vital concept in Sanatan á¸harma and means an action (Kriya) of a karta (person performing it) and its associated result (cause and effect). Understanding karmÄ and its source are vital to interpreting this concept (can be explored on this portal). A sloka from ÅrÄĢmad BhagavÄd Gita, Chapter 9 of Rajavidya Rajaguhya Yoga, Sloka 21, wherein Gitacharya (ÅrÄĢ KášášŖáša) says:
⤤े ⤤ं ā¤ुā¤्⤤्ā¤ĩा ⤏्ā¤ĩ⤰्ā¤ā¤˛ोā¤ं ā¤ĩिā¤ļा⤞ं ā¤्⤎ी⤪े ā¤Ēु⤪्⤝े ā¤Žā¤°्⤤्⤝⤞ोā¤ं ā¤ĩिā¤ļ⤍्⤤ि।
ā¤ā¤ĩ ⤤्⤰⤝ी⤧⤰्ā¤Žā¤Žā¤¨ुā¤Ē्⤰ā¤Ē⤍्⤍ा ā¤ā¤¤ाā¤ā¤¤ं ā¤ाā¤Žā¤ाā¤Žा ⤞ā¤ā¤¨्⤤े।।
Meaning, after spending a certain time in heaven (Swarga:loka) the JÄĢva depletes its karmÄphala and falls back into other mortal lokas, and so the cycle (saášsÄra) of karmÄ (actions defined as per VedÄ and the outcome of those actions) and janma (taking birth) continues as long as the life of desire (kama) continues.
Åiva (Nataraj) performing the cosmic dance with Parvati witnessing it. Snake and Evil under His feet. (n.d.)
Let us take a deeper look into the concept of pápa and puńya. Before that, please note that SanÄtana á¸harma literature refers to various related concepts like IÅvara, KarmÄ, and Guru. However, these concepts are not principles because this is not a philosophy, and since this explanation is in English (rendered from Sanskrit and other Vedic inherent languages), words like “principles” and “rules” should not be taken literally. Why? For this, we have to understand what SanÄtana á¸harma is all about, and this can be explored on this portal. Pápa can also be called the concept that cannot touch the one who is grateful and dwells in Jnana or the magnificence of IÅvara, but can throw the ignorant deep into the pits of Naraka:loka. This being one of the vital topics of SanÄtana á¸harma, let us dive deeper. Another way of defining pápa is an action when performed by a karta (person who is performing it) solely for fulfilling one’s desire, whether that desire is rÄga (liking) or dveášŖa (hatred). Even if karmÄ associated with an action is explained and encouraged by ÅÄstra, it doesn’t necessarily make it puńya. Let us say one seeks the desired outcome, either out of rÄga (liking) or dveášŖa (hatred), and so performs an action hoping to fulfill that desire, then it is called pápa. Now, before we jump to any conclusions, let us understand this thoroughly. Then what is puńya? At a high level, both puńya and pápa are the same because one is a “kree:needa” to the other, meaning one shadows the other. But why? Because puńya is something we enjoy through some sort of availability (say good health or mind and body, peace, materials of comfort, and more), but they get exhausted in kÄlÃĄ or kÄlÃĄam (time), and what lies at the end of each puńya is pápa and vice versa. If we love something, there is always the dormant fear of losing it; so anything that can disturb what we desire automatically results in hate, but irrespective of what we like or dislike, kÄlÃĄ(m) (time) exhausts it no matter what. (Srichaganti. S.V.V, 2014., p.1., Srichaganti. K.D.S, n.d., p.5)
There are three means by which pápa and puńya can be committed. They are MÄnas, Vaachika, and ÅarÄĢra, and each results in its respective phala (fruit/consequence).
MÄnas is the thought process of a JÄĢva influenced by VÄsanÄ (inherent tendencies). Just an ill thought about others or their property, or about IÅvara or ÅÄstra itself is a pápa of mÄnas. The same applies to puńya. Just thinking about IÅvara or á¸harma and hoping to perform á¸harma:sÄdhanÄ (strive towards walking the path of á¸harma) itself constitutes puńya. An honest thought of á¸harma itself can uplift a human. One might not believe in ÅÄstra or IÅvara, but rather than claiming the unknown, if one imagines ill and schemes to undermine ÅÄstra or IÅvara, such thoughts result in pápa. Before a committed act, one must resolve that act as a thought and that thought can define as puńya or pápa. The thought is a very powerful thing and just a thought can trigger various chemical (rasayana) reactions within the body and can either throw one’s health out of balance or bring it to composure. The following is a sloka from ÅÄstra:
Paradravesya vidyanam| manasa:nista chintanam||
vithathabe:invechachya| Threevidham manasam smrutham||
ā¤Ē⤰ā¤Ļ्⤰ā¤ĩे⤏्⤝ा ā¤ĩिā¤Ļ्⤝ा⤍ं| ā¤Žā¤¨ā¤¸:⤍ि⤏्ā¤:ā¤ि⤍्ā¤¤ā¤¨ā¤Ž||
ā¤ĩि⤠⤠ाā¤Ŧी:⤍िā¤ĩेā¤ā¤¸्ā¤ा| ā¤Ĩ्⤰ीā¤ĩि⤧ाā¤Ž ā¤Žा⤍⤏ं ⤏्ā¤Žृ⤤ं||
Meaning, fostering ill thoughts and ill feeling towards others or towards “PÄradravesya” (other’s possessions) is considered pápa of mÄnas as it results in dush:karmÄ, the fruit/consequence (karmÄ:phala) of which one will have to suffer with a deformity of mind or lack of content or peace of mind in future.
Vaachika means, that which is said through Vak (speech) using the indriya (mouth/tongue).
Paarushya amrutanchaiva| Paishunchapi sarvarsha:haa||
A:samvardha pralapascha| Vangmaschi dhurvidham||
ā¤Ēा⤰ु⤎्⤝ ā¤
ā¤Žृ⤤ाā¤्ā¤ैā¤ĩा| ā¤Ēैā¤ļु⤍ā¤ाā¤Ēी ⤏⤰्ā¤ĩā¤ļा:ā¤šां||
ā¤
⤏ंā¤ĩ⤰्⤧ ā¤Ē्⤰⤞ाā¤Ēाā¤ļ्ā¤ा| ā¤ĩंā¤ā¤Žा⤏ā¤ी ⤧ु⤰्ā¤ĩि⤧ाā¤Ž ||
Meaning, ill words, rudeness (Paarushya), or lies (amrutanchaiva) said using speech will result in Vachika pápam. People who say such things just for fun, personal pleasure, hate, or jealousy are evil (Paishunchapi) in nature. Such pápa also applies to those who talk carelessly just for the purpose of gossip (a:samvardha pralapascha), with no sense of truth or purpose, leading to a careless attitude and immoral character (again morality is not a concept of SanÄtana Dharma, it is an illustrative reference), inadvertently spreading lies and confusion (Vangmaschi dhurvidham) or a false impression about themselves or others. Even if there exist facts in what one speaks, one should always consider the place and time to speak. One can’t attend a devotional ceremony and indulge in irrelevant gossip disturbing others, corrupting the environment, and lowering one’s own prospects of evolving in consciousness. This is the reason why Shastra (ÅÄstra) says, it is á¸harma that a human being should follow four crucial characteristic traits.
A:himsa satyamasteyam|
soucham indriya:nigraha:ha||
ā¤
ā¤šिं⤏ा ⤏⤤्ā¤¯ā¤Žā¤¸्⤤े⤝ं| ā¤ļौā¤ं:ā¤ā¤¨्ā¤Ļ्⤰⤝ाँ⤍िā¤्ā¤°ā¤šं||
“A:himsa” meaning non-violence, “satyamasteyam” means to always be truthful and speak the truth, “soucham” means cleanliness and personal hygiene, and finally “indriya:nigraha:ha” means to be in control of our sense organs and not be a slave to their weaknesses.
Maharśi Vishvamitra made innumerable efforts to make King Harishchandra commit a lie; however, even after countless difficulties, the loss of his family, kingship, fame, and wealth, the king didn’t deviate from the path of truth. Such is the resolve of a man with a character who follows á¸harma. It was his resolve that brought down heavens and Gods to stand in front of him ready to grant his wishes. Yet he didn’t succumb to selfishness or personal comfort, he chose the well-being of his entire kingdom as his wish.
In the same way, pious, soft, and well-spoken words, or IÅvara (Ishwara) nÄma sankÄĢrtana will result in Vaachika puńya.
Finally, Sharira means the physical body given by Prakruti (Prakášti), and any act committed using the means of this body results in pápa or puńya. The one who performs an action is called Karta and the action itself is called kriya. Any kriya performed by a karta, together with its result, is called karmÄ. Any kriya performed in line with the á¸harma of one’s ashram is called sat:karmÄ, else dush:karmÄ. Let us take an example from one of the Itihasa of ÅrÄĢ Ramayanam, wherein Ravana kidnapped Sita Devi – which was an atrocious pápa and is considered as “muulagati”. Sita Devi was the á¸harmapatni of someone else (ÅrÄĢ Rama), and Shastra (ÅÄstra) says one must view and address all women other than one’s own á¸harmapatni as a mother. Hence the sloka from Shastra (ÅÄstra):
Matruvat paradhareshu|
Paradravyani lostavat||
ā¤Žा⤤ृā¤ĩ⤤ ā¤Ē⤰⤧ा⤰े⤎ु| ā¤Ē⤰ā¤Ļ्⤰ā¤ĩ्⤝ा⤪ि ⤞ो⤏ā¤ाā¤ĩ⤤||
“PÄradhareshu” (all women, other than your wife), should be viewed as “Matruvat” (mother-like). And “PÄradravyani”, or objects belonging to others, should be treated as stones and dirt with no significance; hence the word “lostavat”. This is the reason why in many Southern India languages words for relationships with women (except á¸harmapatni) have “amma” or “talli” (mother) incorporated in them. Even women who are strangers are addressed with the title of mother.
Similarly, any kriya in line with the karta’s á¸harma is considered as satkarmÄ and results in puńya. (ÅrÄĢ Bharati Tirta Swamy. 2013. The Three Types of Paapa & Punya)
Now the real question, then how should one act devoid of puńya and pápa? We have an answer in the sloka from ÅrÄĢmad Bhagavat Gita, part of ÅrÄĢ Maha:bharath(am), composed by Maharśi VedÄ VyÄsa, chapter 16, sloka 24:
“⤤⤏्ā¤Žाā¤्ā¤ा⤏्⤤्⤰ं ā¤Ē्ā¤°ā¤Žा⤪ं ⤤े ā¤ा⤰्⤝ाā¤ा⤰्⤝ā¤ĩ्⤝ā¤ĩ⤏्ā¤Ĩि⤤ौ।”
“Tasmaac Shastram pramaananche Karya karyou vyavasthitho.
What this means is, one should perform kriya (action) because ÅÄstra says so, and not because one likes the kriya (action) or likes its outcome. This type of performing Kriya without desire is called Nishkama KarmÄ. Desire should not be the basis for a kriya (action) or its associated karmÄ, and so when ÅÄstra is taken as the basis, then the KarmÄ that is associated with it gets nullified. This is the reason why a jÃąani (gyani) is not associated with an ashram and hence the Dharma of that ashram is not applicable to the jÃąani, and subsequently, the karmÄ associated with that á¸harma gets neutralized. Now, why should Shastra be the basis, and what exactly is Shastra? Please read the topic of SanÄtana á¸harma to explore the meaning of ÅÄstra.
For a common man, new to ÅÄstra, is this really practical or possible? The answer is no, it is not. Then what is the answer? Manava or Manushya (human being) is a bundle of desires arising from the VÄsanÄ (habitual influence) carried by the inner dwelling JÄĢva, whose main reason for taking this existence (as a human) is to shed that VÄsanÄ and move into higher planes of consciousness. This very desire should be channeled and used as a ladder to uplift ourselves and walk towards becoming a jÃąani, with a lifestyle that fosters that upliftment as presented by ÅÄstra. ÅÄstra, like a parent, has our well-being in its message; and though one might face difficulty understanding it and implementing it, that doesn’t make it wrong. It might be tough to follow such a lifestyle, especially in Kali:yuga, but one needs to understand that our very existence as a human is an opportunity to shed our pápa and puńya and exit this reality through jÃąana. This only happens through devotion, by means of which humility and compassion bloom within our hearts.
The statement “pápa-puńya getting exhausted” can be rephrased as Åiva (Åiva) devouring pápa-puńya from a JÄĢva by giving it its appropriate suffering and happiness (which is known as karmÄ phala, or fruit of KarmÄ). Åiva(Åiva) doesn’t just devour lokas (worlds) in His “Laya” process but also devours our pápa-puńya. He, as a father, bears witness to His children’s actions and disciplines them for dush:karmÄ, and compliments karmÄ in line with á¸harma, but doesn’t overwrite their will.
In SanÄtana á¸harma, ÅrÄĢ ViášŖášu/IÅvara is the one who devours both pápa and puńya. Neither while giving happiness (by devouring puńya) does IÅvara feel happy nor does He feel sad when giving suffering. He is “KarmÄ-A:karmÄ phala pradata”, meaning He gives the fruits of both karmÄ and A:karmÄ. In the form (or concept) of Ghora, He punishes, as Aghora He gives happiness. Hence, in SanÄtana á¸harma, there are no two separate entities, one to punish and the other to give happiness. In sloka 89 of the ViášŖášusahasranÄma Stotram from ÅrÄĢ Maha:bharatam – composed by Maharśi VedÄ VyÄsa – Bhisma Pitha:maha, during the final hours of his life, says:
“ā¤ā¤¯ā¤ृ⤤्-ā¤ā¤¯ā¤¨ाā¤ļ⤍ः”
“Bhaya-kruth Bhaya-Nashana”
(Srichaganti. K.D.S, n.d., p.1-19, Indian Hindu Pooja. S.V.S.S. n.d.)
Meaning He who both frightens us and also takes away our fears.
Now, from the yogic standpoint, pápa is nothing but ignorance (avidya), which is a result of failed efforts in the past. If one doesn’t strive on the path of Yoga and in self-inquiry, and in the company of enlightened beings, this avidya continues and roots deeper. This Avidya itself is termed as pápa (in English it is translated as Sin). In the profound composition of his Yoga, Maharśi Vasista explains to ÅrÄĢ Rama that:
“Sin is only ignorance and it is destroyed by enquiry; hence one should never abandon enquiry”
(Swami Venkatesananda.
ÅrÄĢ Chaganti Koteshwar Rao (Orator). (n.d.). Kanaka Dhara Stotram [Audio Part 1-19, Recorded by Srichaganti.net]. Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. Retrieved from http://www.english.srichaganti.net/KanakaDharaStrotram.aspx
Sri Bharati Tirta Swamy (Orator). (May 30, 2013). The Three Types of Paapa & Punya . Gajwal, Andhra Pradesh, India. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/m5LLuGjQE2Q
Indian Hindu Pooja. (n.d.). ÅrÄĢ Vishnu Sahasranama Stotram. Retrieved from https://www.indianhindupuja.com/blank-p9ugf.
All Glory to ÅrÄĢ ÅrÄĢ Guru and Gauranga. (Nov 27, 2005). Srimad Bhagavad Gita. Retrieved from http://www.bhagavad-gita.org/Gita/verse-07-16.html
Gita Supersite. (n.d.). Developed and Maintained by IIT Kanpur. Retrieved from https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in
Shiva as Nataraj performing the cosmic dance as Parvati witnessing it.(n.d.). Pininterest, Åiva Nataraja – Lord of the Dance Sculpture Hindu Art statue. Retrieved from: https://goo.gl/images/4EkcgC
Bali donating to Vamana Murty, while Guru Shukracharya asking Bali not to (Sadhashiva temple Nuggehalli, Karnataka, India).(Dec 7, 2015). A rain-soaked trip to Nuggehalli. File: img_9606.jpg. Retrieved from: https://sujnaturelover.wordpress.com/tag/sadhashiva-temple/
Swami Venkatesananda. (1993). VaÅiášŖášha’s Yoga. New York, Albany: State University of New York Press
Samsara: Often misinterpreted as a person entering gruhastu ashram(am) (married state of life), actually refers to the never ending loop of jiva performing kriya (action) with an associated karma and gaining its respective karma:phala (fruit of karma) and exhausting this karma:phala thought another actions which is also a karma with its own karma:phala. In this way a jiva hops through various upadhi (forms of existence) trying to exhaust its karma:phala, but, in-return gaining more. Since gruhastu ashram(am) involves various karma associated towards taking care of not just the self, but the entire family, created the notion that gruhastu ashram(am) posses a challenge towards walking towards gyana(m), which is not true. The only way this cycle is broken is to move towards gyana(m) though devotion and reach moksha. Its only in the path towards gyana(m) that human reaches a state of viragyam, at which point the ashram(am) and its associated karma are no more applicable. A jiva in such state, through its atma, realizes oneself to be an extension of Para:matma and detaches itself from its host body, yet operates through it treating it like a disposable shell or a cloth.